Lindsay Buziak Murder

JUSTICE FOR LINDSAY BUZIAK

Lindsay Buziak Murder

on November 11, 2011

cropped-meatsaanich

“IF YOU WISH TO POST A COMMENT OR READ COMMENTS, SCROLL DOWN DIRECTLY BELOW TO THE SMALL COMMENTS BUTTON AND PRESS ON IT TO TAKE YOU TO THE MAIN COMMENTS PAGE. YOU CAN REPLY TO A POST BY PRESSING THE REPLY BUTTON OR SCROLL TO THE BOTTOM TO POST. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO USE YOUR REAL NAME.”

This site has been created for the sole purpose of sharing information to help SOLVE THE HEINOUS MURDER of LINDSAY BUZIAK of Victoria B.C. Canada.  Lindsay Buziak was a beautiful hardworking 24 year old woman who was viciously murdered in the Victoria suburb of Saanich at 1702 De Sousa Place on February 2, 2008.  She was stabbed to death at 5:38 – 5:41 p.m. while performing her duty as a ReMax Camosun Realtor showing a vacant home For Sale to a couple.  Her killers and planners are still free.  Her murder remains unsolved by Saanich Police lead by Constable Chris Horsley.  If you have any information which could lead to the arrest of the people involved in Lindsay’s murder please contact CRIME STOPPERS or Lindsay’s father Jeff Buziak: jeffbuziak@hotmail.com  There is a reward being offered.

This site is for the exclusive use of serious individuals wanting to make posts and share their information and personal thoughts that pertain to Lindsay’s murder.  We are grateful for your support.  Justice must be imposed on those individuals involved in this heinous act.  As Facebook has closed down discussion boards this is where our quest will continue for the truth and facts pertaining to Lindsay’s mysterious execution style murder.  Information on this site is from personal opinions and cannot be guaranteed or warranted by this site or its administrators in any way.

Thank You,

Justice for Lindsay Supporters

DATELINE NBC     “Unsolved: The Dream House Mystery”

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/39226448/ns/dateline_nbc-crime_reports/t/unsolved-dream-house-murder/#.WCeuDH0rLmg

LINDSAY BUZIAK MURDER TIMELINE

https://lindsaybuziakmurder.com/about/lindsay-buziak-murder-timeline/

RECENT PODCAST

Brain Scratch – John Lordan
 
 
 
Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVjjzBuNdQo 

 

 

*scroll to bottom of page to leave a comment


7,650 responses to “Lindsay Buziak Murder

  1. Svetlana says:

    Janet Edna Merivale Austin
    What does she do? Having a title such as Lieutenant General I hope she can do something. We should write to her.
    Phone: 250-387-2080
    Email: ghinfo@gov.bc.ca
    Fax: 250-387-2078

    The salutation is “Your Honour”.

    Her Honour the Honourable Janet Austin, OBC and/or His Honour Ashley Chester
    Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia
    Government House
    1401 Rockland Avenue
    Victoria, B.C. V8S IV9

    • Dennis says:

      As part of her role as Lieutenant Governor, Her Honour travels extensively throughout British Columbia to celebrate, inspire and connect the people of the province and is invited to and attends hundreds of events each year. She also hosts events at Government House in Victoria, the ceremonial home of all British Columbian

      She has no authority to address any of this. I suppose you could continue to write but she will (if she does) likely reply that she will “forward” your concerns (although I doubt that) to the appropriate party but her role is basically a rep for the province under the old British rule.

  2. Just a Canadian Citizen says:

    Jeff you have been protecting Lindsays friends for 13 years now? Sometimes the devil is right in front of your face. Awhile back I made a comment about her friends and you attacked me on a PM. I think that if you want this solved you may have to look at all avenues.

    • Svetlana says:

      This is the worst for a community and a family

    • ConnectTheDots says:

      The devil is right in front of us and it is not Lindsay’s friends. Just take a look at the actions and inactions of the people who were closest to her at the time. It is obvious. There is nothing unusual about this case. It is murder 101 and the police should have had this solved a long time ago.

    • OceanWaves says:

      Jeff is not protecting anyone. Giving someone the benefit of the doubt or trusting them at their word is not protection. I guarantee 100% as a parent, you have thought about and checked out every angle you can in trying to help solve your own daughters murder. The reason why this (idea about Jeff checking out Lindsay’s friends himself) is a problem is that the family of Lindsay should not have to help police resolve the murder or look for the killers themselves.
      That is the burden of the police. Jeff is neither an idiot and not sleeping on the job. I have 100% confidence that he has done more than the police in Saanich investigating all avenues. Jeff hasn’t checked something it’s because he does not have access to those records, not for a lack of thought or trying.
      Did Nicole Simpsons parents find her killer (s)? no- the Los Angeles police made an arrest and made charges.
      Did Meredith Kerchers parents search for the killers?- no, the Italian police made multiple arrests and charges.
      I do not know of any other case on the planet where a child has been murdered and people expect the family to do everything in their power to resolve it. That’s the police’s (and community’s) responsibility.
      Let’s circle back to several police officials retiring the night before Lindsay’s murder. Sounds like a movie. But which one? and what larger role might this event have played in Lindsay’s murder? Does it give someone clearance? A motive? An alibi? In what several way (s) is this (retirement party) not a coincidence and part of the orchestration of Lindsay’s murder?

      • Rosannr says:

        Well said

      • ConnectTheDots says:

        Sounds like a bad B movie. You can bet that was not a coincidence and no surprise, one of the prime suspects is well known to have ties to the SPD. Just get this solved SPD. You are really starting to look at the very least inept and possibly corrupt. The way this has been handled is an embarrassment to B.C.

      • Svetlana says:

        Last year I noticed how the ex-girlfriend of Jason got a new logo for her business and the paisley print sort of reminded me of this website’s swirl designs at the top.

      • Just a Canadian Citizen says:

        I would never expect any parent or family member to solve any murder. I wanted to suggest that perhaps some of Lindsay’s friends may know exactly what happened and Jeff speaking to them could help him heal. I understand, it appears, all of Saanich is scared. Perhaps Jeff has already spoken to the friends and knows whatever they know. I would never expect him to share that information on a public forum. It is very obvious there is something going on at the SPD. Writing letters result in nothing, trust me I have written. Hopefully when some of the SPD (whoever it may be) retire Justice Will Be Served. I too am a parent and very aware of what girlfriends know, believe me they know much more than male friends ever share. I thought Anna’s post could have some useful information. I have not seen the video of the friends nor the video of the walk. We are all on this site for the same goal, Justice For Lindsay and her family.

    • OceanWaves says:

      Something just told me to pull over and post: a lot of people might get 2 of Lindsay’s friends mixed up. Both Dalyce and Nikki are blondes. Dalyce is the Wellness guru and friends with Andrea and Sabrina. Nikki on the other hand is seen in some photos but not part of the original core group.

      • ConnectTheDots says:

        Something just told you to pull over and post? Could you please describe that for us?

        • OceanWaves says:

          I tend to think quite a bit when I drive but it’s more free flowing than controlled thoughts. Thanks for asking. I am now also honing in on these two (2) items of note:
          1) the plague of Jason and Oatman supposedly being at SHC just before Lindsay’s murder and then being on the road supposedly or parked outside when Lindsay’s murder happened. If the video was truly taken on that night and that time, let’s all think about this- there were not one but 6 cars in that video surveillance (I am referring to the one show on Dateline Dream House Murder episode 2 which can be found on Youtube).
          If investigators did their due diligence there would be written information in the murder investigation file as to the owners of the other 5 vehicles and whether or not those vehicles were actually also at the property on that date and that time.
          Follow? In other words, if Jason was parked next to a Honda for example with the license plate 55533322 the owner of that car would have had to have been interviewed in order to confirm that the CCTV was not a fake and filmed at another date and time. Also weird is the camera on the CCTV panning up to the sky or panning at all -if indeed the footage is the same from the Dateline video. That document with those interviews (of other automobile owners parked in the lot at the same time Jason was or not) can be submitted to the public with license plates and names redacted easily.
          item #2) Concept/idea to ponder: the murderers don’t have to be physically with the burner phone the entire time on the day of the murder.
          I believe the murdering couple that says they were “Flying in from Vancouver” (per reporter Zander Sherman on October 3rd 2020, Capital Daily) which takes 35 min. The burner phones could have ridden on the Ferry without the murdering couple creating yet another red herring effect. (Example: the couple flies in from Vancouver then the male accomplice calls an unsuspecting relative and says “can you bring me this phone that I forgot in my room in Vancouver and give it to me in Saanich since I am already here?”) .
          Unsuspecting relative says “okay” and rides the BC Ferries to Saanich and give the burner phone to the murdering couple. Therefore, the couple could have been in Saanich for days weeks or even months leading up to the murder. How many people actually Fly in from Vancouver to Saanich every day? My guess is that it’s a small number of people that would spend that kind of money just to shave 3.5 hours off their Ferry ride.
          ***Thus, I’m going to dub the murdering couple that killed Lindsay “The Flyers” since to me that is a clue that points to who the murderers are. ***

          • eight says:

            The Vancouver Airport is very close to the ferry terminal on the mainland as the crow flies. You can actually see one from the other. The Victoria Airport is very close to the ferry terminal on the Island side. The travel path of the ferry and the travel path of an aircraft between the two points is very similar.

            Would the ping of a cell phone be off the same towers between those points no matter the mode of travel? Anyone know?

            • OceanWaves says:

              Industry Canada would know. They are the ones responsible for allowing installation of a cell phone tower (s). It is mandatory that businesses such as the Ferry and Airports, for example, share a tower to reduce the overall number of towers. The top 4 carriers according to whistleout.ca are Bell, Rodgers, Telus and Freedom Mobile. There are a few websites claiming to allow us to see where the towers are mapped from CellMapper to SCADACORE but none I have tried have worked. I called airport security in Victoria but they had no information to offer about it. Circling back to this one next week.

          • ConnectTheDots says:

            The video looks like it is too light out to be 5:30. On February 2 anyone who lives in B.C. needs to pay attention to how dark it is at 5:30. Do security camera’s typically pan about as on that video? Any I’ve had or seen video of are fixed in one position.

    • Michael says:

      is there a friend or friends in particular you have suspicious feelings about? Also is there anything in particular that you are basing them on? I’m just curious as im always open to hearing new idea and thoughts on this.

  3. anna says:

    Jeff Buziak, you really need to watch this.

    • Jeff Buziak, father says:

      Thank you. Gee, I wonder what police agency the man in the uniform was from that she is referring to!

    • Jeff Buziak, father says:

      Thank you for sharing this. I saw it this morning just after 6 a.m. and watched it a few times before my day began to unfold. My day usually starts with murder, of course, right after I awake if I’ve slept much at all. Lindsay’s unsolved murder weighs heavily on lots of us wondering what the heck are those Saanich cops doing/not doing that takes so bloody long to make arrests. Totally ludicrous!! I guess this proves they are just fucking around!!
      I am going to reserve my opinion on this video so as to not influence others who watch it to formulate their own opinions and conclusion. I’ve said for a long time now that lack of evidence isn’t the problem in Lindsay’s unsolved murder; Saanich police are the problem which is very clear here if you choose to follow this.
      On that, I wonder who the man in uniform is this woman speaks about that is retiring in 2024? Is it Saanich’s millionaire real estate investor truck driving detective? or the skirt tugging inspector head of detective division? or the old boyz club appointed Chief himself Scott Green? Whoever it is they may have to change their plans for retirement in 2024 or wait, they are so arrogant they don’t care. The truth shall be revealed!
      Lack of evidence isn’t the problem; Saanich police are the problem.
      No Arrests-No Respect!
      Watch and Share.
      Thank you.

    • Jeff Buziak, father says:

      We investigated ourselves and cleared ourselves of any wrongdoing has been their latest smoke and mirrors manipulation of the media and the public. They don’t fool me anymore. Performance of Duty tells the truth. Saanich police have the poorest record in Greater Victoria as printed in the media. 13 years with no arrests in Lindsay’s murder which everyone knows who was involved! DUH! 4 police chiefs and at least 5 heads of Lindsay’s murder file and no arrests with charges! All poorly trained individuals I suppose? They all don’t care?

      C’mon, an eight year old could see what the problem is here. Its either a whole bunch of dummies operating there or a coverup. Lack of evidence isn’t the problem; Saanich police are the problem! Its like the monkeys have taken over running the zoo called Saanich police or a dark thread has permeated the place supported by the long line of poor leadership and the whole place needs a complete roto-rooting.

      Justice for Lindsay!

      No Arrests-No Respect

    • Lillian says:

      Thanks for that. Very interesting. What I drew from the “reading” was the affair with Horsley & mommy dearest. That scenario hadn’t crossed my mind as the “thing” that Lindsay witnessed that could not be unseen! I had always surmised it was the money laundering in real estate that she had “seen.” Course, it could be both. I think it’s Horsley as the “uniform” person because I think he had the most to loose if caught with mommy dearest. I’m sure one of those losses would not only be his career but his family too. Although I am torn in that loyalty (wife) because she has to be suspicious of Horsley’s actions, but then again there are many spouses who devalue themselves by having their head in the sand, aka denial. Or she has probably been threatened & fears for her livelihood and life as she is likely fully aware of the makings of Lindsay’s murder. I believe the Zailo’s remain the killers, orchestrated, planned (ever so poorly) and executed with the assistance to cover it up, destroy and compromise evidence by Horsley and his minions. Doesn’t get anymore OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE than that!

      I am not receptive to wait another 3 agonizing years for 2024. 13 is plenty.

    • Just a Canadian Citizen says:

      Wow, very interesting. Praying this case is solved way before 2024. I believe there are many many people in Saanich that know who, what and why. In order to speak out you must have a conscience, appears many out there do not. Justice for Lindsay. Being a Canadian, not living in BC ever, this whole case makes me ill.

  4. anna says:

    I’ve always wanted to say this, and, i know i could be wrong and im sorry if i am but, i just want to get this said. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfU7L6du8XU in this video at 1 min 49 secs, her friend looks guilty when she says, how do u live when you’ve done something like that, her eyes look guilty, she hides her lips, thats a sign of guilt, and she looks like shes tryin to not laugh, then she lets out a smile..what i find odd about her too is, there is a picture of her cheek an cheek with lindsay’s bf but lindsay was in the pic with them. its odd to me how close she was to him, instead of lindsay being beside him cheek to cheek, she was. the pic screams to me that they either had something going together, or wanted something together. what i want to say is, her against him in that pic…and her looking guilty in the video, tryin to not laugh, an letting out a smile after saying how do u live with yourself when you’ve done such a thing, referring to the killers….i just find this odd. maybe she should be looked into. again if im wrong i apologize a trillion times, but i find it odd.

    • Jeff Buziak, father says:

      They all want Lindsay’s murder to be solved. Lindsay was very close to all her girlfriends and they remember joyous happy times together. Angry, mad, envious is part of a childhood based girls group, I observed having two daughters who have lots of friends, but to extend that to murder is a big, big, stretch. There is a bond and a love between close girlfriends where murder has no place. I stand to be corrected but I don’t see it personally.

      • Delores says:

        I don’t see it either. What I do see is a police department that is way in over their heads. They have no experience investigating a murder. My husband and I just watched this on a Dateline re-Run that we had recorded. We were so sad that Linsay’s killer wasn’t found. I told my husband o would google her name and see if the killer has been found. We are both surprised that they have not been found. Someone needs to find them to give your family closure. I don’t even know how you do it other than everyday could be the day that you find her killer. Prayers and our deepest sympathy to your family. My husband and I have buried s child ourselves so we know that pain.

      • anna says:

        yeah, i know i could be wrong, truly sorry if i am, clearly being around her friends, you’d have a better sense of the person, and if they were involved, i respect that. Im sorry what happened to your daughter, and ill be very happy to hear they are caught, whoever did it, i hope justice is soon. take care

    • OceanWaves says:

      I really want to know who in th Saanich circle used to work with Lindsay when she worked at Maverick in Vancouver. There could have been a grudge or vendetta with a woman, a man or a couple starting back then that no one was aware of, even before Lindsay worked with the Zailos at ReMax in Saanich. The burner phones bought in Vancouver, attached to a building address in Vancouver by this “Paulo Rodriguez” character. I’m feeling the building is connected more than police think, not a random address at all. I’d like to know the address of that building attached to the burner phone registration.

    • Michael says:

      yeah I dont see what you saw Anna, I didn’t see any moment that I thought laughter being held back. I
      did see the lip thing you spoke of but don’t think that was anything at all.
      more over I dont know how much one could put into any body language analysis of the girls in that interview. they are not celebrities therefore not used to being on camera, and unnatural or odd things could be a result of just that. them not being comfortable and natural do to the setting.

  5. Mackenzie says:

    So sorry for your loss. I hope you are able to find your peace and closure.

    • see closely says:

      Yes!
      We all (on this blog) symphatize with Jeff -as well as with maternal branch of family of Lindsay-regarding this heart breaking murder case that is still not resolved after 13 years.We pray that it will be solved soon and that the healing for entire family will begin shortly after.

  6. Micheal says:

    I just realized that bad I feel for those paying taxes for this police department. They have a police force who is literally saying, this crime is unsolved because and until someone comes forward and tells them who did it. What the hell is the point of paying investigators for this police force if they cant solve a crime unless someone else solves the crime and tells them?
    Now it is pathetic for that to be true but they need to invent a new word that goes far beyond pathetic to describe the fact the police department is actually basically saying this out loud and doesn’t even realize how shameful and sad that makes them look. I just can’t believe they would actually say something so sad and pathetic out loud, More over how does someone above them with the power to do so not hear them say we cant do our job unless its done for us, not find someone who can do the job.
    Just imagine being able to do that at your job and get away with and and paid. Imagine you in charge of a job with international eyes on it and your boss asking you ” Hey why are you not getting the job done”, And you sit there and seriously reply back, ” o, it cause no one has come and done the job for me yet”.
    Now i’m sure Horsley response would be, im taking this out of context, that they are not saying they need to told exactly who did it to solve the case, rather they need certain people to talk to be able to crack the case. Well my response to that it , that doesn’t make it any less shameful. If you know what needs to happen to get your job done make it happen.
    What kind of sorry ass police force doesn’t know how to get people to talk, how to apply pressure? You got all these lowlifes surrounding this case and this police force is seriously saying they dont know how to out wit them.
    I mean this case really gives off the feel that everybody in that city knows who did it except the police.

    • ConnectTheDots says:

      ” Hey why are you not getting the job done”, And you sit there and seriously reply back, ” o, it cause no one has come and done the job for me yet”.
      This is exactly what is happening. It is pathetic.

    • Jeff Buziak, father says:

      I’m relieved to see someone gets how ludicrous this unsolved murder is with dum/dum Saanich police in charge of the file. The latest police chief is so arrogant he won’t even acknowledge Lindsay’s unsolved murder publicly or me if I have any inquiries. They are a disgrace lead by a chief who could care less about women murdered in his territory. His sole concern is his pride and his pension. Fuck the citizens he serves and those that die during his watch. This guy, Scott Green, has held every senior position in the department since Lindsay was murdered up to now being chief because of the corrupted system that exists in the Saanich police department allowed by the Mayor and the police board. Saanich do not hire this position with open completion. The position is awarded by ass-kissing inside an old boys club. The last Mayor tried to change that and was hounded by police until they ran him out of office. It is so pathetic they put spyware on his computer and his executive assistant was the then police chiefs wife who he couldn’t replace because of a union. Scott Green knows everything about Lindsay’s murder and is solely responsible to see arrests made and people charged. That should be sooner than later and if any more time transpires, he needs to be dismissed with disgrace.

      You follow into line at Saanich and in the police department or you get pushed out. It’s basically a useless retirement club with minions doing tasks for useless club leaders waiting to retire and promote each other. They are not accountable and protect that inside and outside the law. The Saanich way. A murdered young woman means nothing to them! They invent every bullshit excuse and explanation why they don’t perform their duty and if you question that at all or challenge them, you are attacked in more ways than one. I’ve experienced their sinister quasi-legal ways. Local media are terrified of them so kiss their ass. They are like gangsters not protectors of the people. Most people fear Saanich police more than local criminals. What does that say?

      It does NOT take 13 years to do a job when you have all the latest tools of the trade and all the information you require. If more is required you get it not wait for it to drop in your lap and then claim you are some kind of heroes. Losers are what they are and I do feel sorry for the good officers there lead by a corrupted Old Boys Club tarnishing their careers. However, you need to do something about it or you are no better than your corrupted leaders.
      I’m not the problem. We are not the problem. Chief Scott Green, Mayor fred Hayes, the slack police board and minister of Public Safety Mike Farnworth are all the problem for allowing this comedy act to continue while citizens live in a murder zone wondering am I next?
      No Arrests-No Respect

      • Matt says:

        Hello from France, just wanted to say I learned recently about this through a youtuber (That chapter), and I’m hoping you will never give up finding the truth for your daughter.
        This is absolutely awful and heartbreaking, especially with a police that is either incompetent or corrupt. I cannot believe they haven’t even found one lead. This is a disgrace.
        May you find solace and answers soon, sir. I really admire you for not giving up and keeping up the fight for Lindsay.

        • eight says:

          France?

          Maybe you could check to see if Inspector Clouseau is busy. He’d be better at this than Saanich police.

          • Dennis says:

            Exactly.

            • MJG says:

              No…no…give the job to that good old worn-out gray trench coat of a guy called “Columbo”, he will clean up the place and solve this case! Ohhhhh if only there was such a guy like that around!!! Unfortunately, they only exist in comic books or in Hollywood movies…..! Nobody dares to be that kind of hero!

  7. Micheal says:

    Jeff, was the witness you did get to speak with, the one you feel is sincere and was driving by at 5:30 the one who gave the description of the dress, and/ or the idea the lady may have been wearing a wig. I assume from what you said about the quick glance the witness had before returning their focus to the road it is not the witness who provided the dress or other description of buyers. Also Would I be correct to assume this witness reached out to you? I just ask that because the way the police have gone about things I would be surprised they provided you this with a name or any way to contacting this witness.

    • Jeff Buziak, father says:

      The witness and I spoke on the street when I was in the murder neighborhood one day. There was no talk of a dress or a wig. 3 people at the end of the driveway then look,back at the road while driving at dusk.

      • Michael says:

        thank you for the reply, so as far as any description of the 3 people beyond there were simply 3 people none of those details you or anyone you trust had been confirmed with the supposed witness who gave them?

        • ConnectTheDots says:

          I think there was a couple out walking their dog too that gave the more detailed description. The dress and short blonde hair description.

        • ConnectTheDots says:

          I had thought that there was mention of a couple out walking their dogs that provided that description of the “buyers” but after watching the Dateline episode 2 again I see that at 2:22 Horsley says that when Jason saw the couple leaving through the front door and is asked to describe them he gives the description of a tall dark haired man and a woman with short blonde hair and describes that dress. Could it be that when Jason is asked to describe the murderers that he says he saw he subconsciously gives a description of his mom only with blonde hair? Does anyone else remember who the witnesses were reported to be originally?

  8. Jeff Buziak, father says:

    Murder The Most Heinous Crime on Mankind
    ….except in Saanich, BC

    The pain of loss is huge but you must learn how to manage that or you crumble. I accept Lindsay is gone and there is no return no matter how much I mourn so coming to acceptance with that is huge and requires faith rather than drugs or alcohol.

    As a man and a proud Canadian I cannot however accept there are not arrests a long time ago. As men and women we must stand for and demand what is right and see justice prevails. Police are autonomous now and that is not good for society or communities as they do as they feel when they feel without accountability. They have come to believe their own poor explanations and excuses as standard practice when in fact it is really poor performance. Their job is to make things happen not wait for things to happen when law and order and safety of citizens is a concern.

    Unfortunately we are all to blame for allowing them to get away with that. They work for the people and must be held accountable to and by the people who they serve. Unfortunately that isn’t the case anymore so situations like Lindsay’s murder drag on and on forever. I am trying to hold them accountable and garner the support of others to do the same. We all know better than anyone that if you don’t work hard to meet a standard of performance and quality of work for people you are soon out of business or fired from your job. Police are immune to this standard of practice and shouldn’t be. They are there to make sure the system continues to function in an orderly and safe manner. Unsolved murders with killers and conspirators walking around is not acceptable way less more than car thieves driving around in stolen cars. Murder is the most heinous crime known to humanity and needs to be treated with the highest of priority.

    More than try to figure it out which most people have already, more pressure needs to be put on Saanich police, the Mayor and the police board. These people must be accountable to citizens! God help everyone. There are conspirators and killers in Victoria, BC who got away with murder and are laughing about it while free as birds. They WILL kill again! Murder! The most heinous crime known to man with no consequences in Saanich, BC. Not Acceptable!

    Thank you very much for your support.
    Jeff Buziak, father

  9. Rosanne says:

    Mr. Horsley should not have or be spending a second spying on the Victim’s family. Watching for them in their grief to make an error, say something wrong or find some other excuse to blame them for his lack of performance. He is being paid for a job and if he can’t do it by now he would know beyond a shadow of doubt that he needs some help on this case and should be beating the bushes to find that! If he even hears about this, shame on him, get back to work, your job is incomplete and being noticed.

  10. Michael says:

    I wanted to add one more thing related to my early comments today on this case. This comment is directly for Horsley, whom should see and read it if he is doing his job on this case, which one would assume keeping an some what of an eye on this blog.
    Horsley I believe has been very outspoken about all the interest in this case and how he feels it a negitive, it will be some sort of burden on any future prosecution. I believe he has even asked Jeff to stop this blog.
    Unfortunately people are killed everyday , in brutual and shocking ways. yet those cases dont grab the public attention like this case has for 13 years do they Horsley? No, so why Horsley is there so much interest and talk.. well I firmly believe a large part of the reason so much talk and interest in this case exists is because so many people take a look at this case and say, this really seems like it should be solved. In fact many people think there is so much there they can solve it themselves.
    Horsley, being upset about the existence of this blog is irrational. It exists because of you and the police departments failure to bring justice in a case where the public feels this one should be solvable. Dont get upset at Jeff be upset with yourself. Being upset with Jeff would be like you being in charge of putting a roof on your house lets say, and a pouring rain comes and all that rain all these voices start pouring into your living room, Jeff is simply there holding a bucket to catch the rain, so dont be mad at him you didn’t do your job right.
    Now sure it possible that so much of the public is wrong, and this case truly is a very difficult case to crack, but that doesn’t matter, your issue is the talk and interest here about this case and that is not going to go away so long as public perception is that this brutal crime should be solvable.
    So Horsley take it upon yourself to end the talk here you hate so much, you could figure out how to change the public mind and show them this really is a difficult case to crack and you doing all you can.
    or you could just solve the case, and just like that Horsley you solve the issue of all this talk you dont like.

  11. Robin says:

    And the Saanich Police Department are sitting on the most vicious unsolved murder of a 24 yr. old woman who was lured to a home to do her job!! Lindsay was murdered. Never to be heard from again by anyone!! The SPD have had Lindsay’s murder in their greasy hands for 13 yrs? This is way beyond acceptable and this is exactly why we are all on this blog, we are fighting for justice and these are the people we are counting on to provide JUSTICE for Murder!
    Holy FK…. Houston there is a major problem here.

    In case you are wondering Saanich news reported this today. December 11, 2020.

    Greater Victoria police officers were dealt at least 16 disciplinary measures between April 1, 2019 and March 31, 2020. (Black Press Media file photo).

    The Saanich Police Department had the highest number, with seven disciplinary measures.

    https://www.saanichnews.com/news/greater-victoria-police-reprimanded-for-urinating-in-public-drunk-driving-report/

    Emls people get sending emls. This is why we have been asking for Lindsay’s unsolved murder to be removed from the SPD. This is why there is a petition with 7266 signatures asking for the investigation to be taken out of the hands of the SPD.

    Mike Farnsworth
    Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General of B.C.
    PSSG.Minister@gov.bc.ca

    Premier Horgan
    Premier@gov.bc.ca

    Saanich Police Chief Scott Green
    sgreen@saanichpolice.ca

    Brenda Lucki— Commissioner Royal Canadian Mounted Police
    Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

    • Wyatt says:

      Please don’t forget these dweebs. They are the ones who police the police and are to be held accountable for the corruption and dirty cops manifesting at the SPD. Course the crocked Mayor Hinakin is at the helm, but sooner than later he will be busted for his criminal activity and associates.

      https://www.saanichpolice.ca/index.php/about-us/saanich-police-board.html
      ** Has authority under section 171 of the Police Act to investigate complaints made about the Department.

      Please don’t forget this entity! It has the authority AND power to investigate the SPD and any of its employees. They are also to report in their minutes any and all correspondence received by complainants and none of mine have EVER been reported. Tells me they throw them in the garbage! This site provides the names of all the Board members and you can also research their background (bio) as to why they received these “appointed” positions. Address all your complaints to the secretary:
      Contact Information

      Lynn George, Secretary to the Saanich Police Board
      250-475-4377
      Secretary@spdboard.ca

      It’s the only CONTACT they publish.

    • Svetlana says:

      Can you trust a woman saying she had no idea who the drug pusher was who rented a house from her and who took pictures with her sons that were on the same hockey team together?

  12. Michael says:

    I started originally thinking SZ was ultimately responsible, then at some point that went down to a 50-50, as time when I she is currently back to being my prime suspect.
    unless the time line of everything shows this can’t be the case, I think Jason over heard lindsay telling her friend something far more threatening to him and his family than she simply intended to leave him.
    from what I gather this idea would not come as a surprise to him, certainly not a 30 call in a row surprise. I think lindsay friend ran from house after hearing something far worse.
    That’s why after 30 calls and him unable to get in touch with lindsay to possibly give her advise on how to undo whatever she told her friend, he gets pissed and says OK fine gave her a chance ill show her, and places the call to mom to inform her of what was said to jeopardize them. If im not mistaken I beileve this call to mom was placed very late in the night, I could be wrong but beileve it was well past any reasonable hour to call your mom to soothe you over the fact you overheard you girlfriend saying she wanted out. More over Shirley seems like the type that would smack him off the back of head for waking her over such a thing.
    As far as the police , I dont think they started this case corrupt, but have screwed it up so bad perhaps have become corrupt in the way covering up their failures.
    I think the reason so many people are drawn to this case beyond justice for the victim, is cause once you look at this case at least for me more than another case you get a feeling of this should be solved. No one who takes a look at this case walks away thinking , gee there nothing there they will never be able to crack this one.
    I’m sure people who know something that could crack this case come to this blog, perhaps even the murderer, and im guessing those people who know something likely have a checkered past. One of you most want some redemption, think of how far helping bring justice in this case could go to helping your soul balance it scale before you leave this world.
    if your afriad certainly you can do something an anonymous letter to the police or Jeff, containing something that will crack the case without you even having to come foward.

    • Svetlana says:

      In the new year, we shall know hopefully the identity of the person who checked for messages. Then we’ll know why it was all covered.

      • Micheal says:

        I fear when it comes to the person who checked the messages we wont know that. I assume what perhaps we may learn is who purchased the burner phones. Im fully prepared to learn it going to be perhaps some homeless person or drug addict who was paid to purchased the phone and sadly that lead end there as said person will have no idea who he purchased them for.

    • MJG says:

      It’s a sure thing, Michael, that the participants of Lindsey’s murder, do come periodically to check-up on how close this case is getting to being solved….or, if names are being named. Some are getting a kick out of our opinions, our assumptions, and our speculations..and others are sweating bullets…or losing their hair, such as Horsely, if you have noticed! With all the money he makes…..it will not bring back his curls on his head! …just saying! However…SHOULD THERE BE one who cares about his own salvation and in need of redemption, well…good news to that person…for, it’s never too late! I would say to this person: send a typed-out registered letter to the attention of Jeff Buziak, explaining what actually happened, with names, dates and facts, along with the “motive” of this brutal murder…..BUT…DO NOT give out your valuable information to the Saanich Police, for I would fear that you might not eat breakfast the following morning! However, that is entirely up to you….to put an end to all of this by doing “THE RIGHT THING” and “BRING PEACE TO LINDSEY BUZIAK SOUL”. With all this said, we must remember that it will never, ever, bring closure to Jeff Buziak..for Lindsey will always remain his baby girl, his daughter…and the horrible way of her passing will forever be there to remind him……but…. it might bring him some peace and could finally allow him to live out the rest of his time on earth! This man deserves peace …he has been steering this humongous ship for the past 13 years without anchoring at any given port! IT IS TIME TO BRING THAT SHIP HOME…..MAKE IT RIGHT…IN GOD’S NAME, MAKE IT HAPPEN!!!

      • Lillian says:

        And “copy” to various media outlets. One of them will have a vested interest and unfortunately in today’s world the content is what sells their news and what will get picked up and published, or at least someone may be intrigued to investigate the evidence. We must keep poking, prodding and eventually someone will do the RIGHT thing. 13 years of this, maybe 2021 will be our peace.

  13. Challe says:

    Be strong

  14. Micheal says:

    Jeff, I’m not sure if there is a similar process in Canada, But have you considered a wrongful death civil suit? Perhaps as a way to force depositions from those not talking. I completely understand if this is something you would not want to comment on in anyway.
    Now I understand people here in the US people can plea the fifth, ( I assume Canada has a similar right from self incrimination), But I imagine some of the people involved may think twice before publicly declaring they are refusing to answer a question about Lindsay’s case as it would incriminate them.
    I don’t think I would patronize a business who’s owner or Management has admitted they fear answering questions about a murder as it would incriminate them. Especially if that murder took place in what would be the natural course of the business the person takes part in.
    I know in the United states a civil suit has less of a burden of proof than in a criminal. I think the burden is more likely than not, rather than the criminal standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.
    If for whatever reason you feel it is unwise to bring that suit/ accusation against a person or persons, perhaps it could be brought against the Real Estate frim for any failures they may have in keeping their employees safe, then compel certain persons to testify in that case.

    • Jeff Buziak, father says:

      I am told there is a two year statute of limitations in Canada for wrongful death lawsuits.

    • Svetlana says:

      And unfortunately, in Canada it is very difficult to sue. No matter what type of crime or negligence is done, people are protected by this or that association. Everything is a long and expensive process. You probably need good connections and time on your hands.

  15. micheal says:

    I was just thinking, If the police are corrupt on this case what kind of weight can we even give the information released to the news recently?
    if the corruptions is systemic and so wide spread can we even have faith and put in stock in the information they ended up releasing?
    it my understanding the police fought to release any of this information, what to stop them from releasing false information and not valid facts from the real file?
    So how on one hand can we put faith in the police while on the other say they can’t be trusted at all.
    it sure be nice and maybe he does, but it sure be nice if Jeff had at least one police officer from that department he could count on to look at things and at least tell him if it’s true and accurate.
    Perhaps it time to lobby the legislature to pass a law requiring police to release information after a certain amount of time, some sort of mechanism to allow familes of victims access to information as if it were a cold case.

    • ConnectTheDots says:

      Good idea. Clearly there needs to be limits. I think we should go one step further and pass a law that automatically makes it a cold case after 5 years and the information is released to the public after the family has had a chance to review all of the information themselves so that they can put a halt on any evidence they feel is unnecessarily hurtful to the victim and their families.

    • Jeff Buziak, father. says:

      There is not one Saanich police officer I can count on. In the past I was able to contact the chief if I was frustrated however the current chief Scott Green will not have any contact with me. The last time I spoke to Scott Green is when he was deputy chief and I found him to be arrogant, insecure and aggressive at that time. Very unprofessional. I have some young part time officer assigned to me as a contact but I might as well talk to the wall. The only response I ever get is some canned line about how determined Saanich police are. Really? 13 fucking years! A single ant could accomplish more in 13 years than the whole Saanich police force put together. I’ve never seen an organization of any kind in my life survive being as unproductive as Saanich police. Talk about feeding from/sucking off the public trough!

      • dag-asle says:

        This case should have been solved within months. We have witnesses, a crime scene, cell phone etc. There must be fingerprint or dna. It¨s like a third world country investigation. Why would they let the boyfriend re enact his movement in plain clothes. That house should have been locked down for 1 year doing forensics. Fuck the lazy and corrupt cucks of the Saanich police. May they burn in hell together with the people who did this.

    • Ken Chappelle says:

      I don’t think the police are corrupt just in over their heads and were in over their head from the get go. The Saanich police have been recently offered the help of outside very experienced experts Gratis, mostly retired Profiler’s with years and years of experience. If I was the Saanich police I would accept the help and learn from the team advancing their own education at the same time. I would be infuriated if after all this time of little to no progress they do not accept the help and decide to handle this themselves the expert help is as good as it gets we know the offer was made but don’t know if it was accepted at this time.

      • Rosanne says:

        Just my opinion. The Daily got to look at court documents. So I would think if Saanich Police are corrupt they would avoid going anywhere near a judge issuing an order to look at anything even close to what they want to keep hidden. The only things that will be able to be obtained would be stuff that covers their butt and makes it look like they are doing an adequate( don’t even want to use that word in this case) job. If they had never asked a court for any records or access to information they would not be even able to fake it. Obviously they only asked for things that would leave this crime unsolved or we wouldn’t be here scratching our heads 13 years later.

      • ConnectTheDots says:

        When were they offered this help? You and I and any other reasonable person that truly wants to see this case solved would accept it but will they? And if not, WHY NOT?

        • Michael says:

          I maybe wrong, but I thought Jeff said they were offered help, but can not be positive as part of the agreement to accept help is the person helping couldn’t tell Jeff a thing, even tell him if he is indeed helping.

      • Robin says:

        How can we find out? If they don’t accept that help then they have no intention to solve Lindsay’s murder. That would Shirley indicate corruption imo.

      • Jeff Buziak, father says:

        Yes, Thank you Ken. True. I was included in this offering as it gained traction. I was the initial contact with Saanich police on this offering from the interested party representing an agency we are all aware of called the FBI. The services of retired members still active as experts were offered and failing that direct contact with active individuals within the organization was available. I was included in the initial correspondence with Saanich police. The very first thing Saanich police did was eliminate me from any further involvement and zero communication on what was or was not transpiring between the parties. The offering party agreed to that and it is now not known whether Saanich welcomed the services offered by this world class trained organization as I was not allowed to be party to even whether their services were accepted or not by Saanich police.
        Fair? Transparent? You tell me.

      • beverly fitzgerald says:

        I agree with you when you say there is no corruption. What there is though, is a serious lack of funding, resources and communication within police agencies in this province. It is sad but it is real. I don’t believe the SP will allow someone from outside this country to look at their files. It doesn’t work that way.

        Statistics show that there is nowhere in Canada where a crime is more likely to go unsolved than in British Columbia. That’s according to a new report card on Canada’s justice system, which showed that the scores for solving both violent and non-violent crime were lower on the West Coast than in any other province or territory across the country in 2017.

        The province didn’t fare much better when it came to people’s faith in the justice system. B.C. tied for the lowest score among provinces when it came to confidence in the system. Meanwhile, British Columbians’ confidence in police was the second-lowest of any province, topping only Quebec.

        I think the problem lies within our judicial system rather than the independent police forces who are ill equipped to take on major homicide cases. As for Lindsay Buziak’s murder investigation something went very wrong and I am not sure justice will ever be served in her case.

        • ConnectTheDots says:

          Were the police pulling over without cause multiple times someone who was running for the position of mayor because of a lack of funding? Were they publicly endorsing the sitting mayor during that election because of a lack of funding? Was the Saanich council illegally spying on the new mayor and attempting to freeze him out so much so that he felt he had to work from home because of a lack of funding? I think it is big of you to want to believe in the SPD but their actions cast doubt on that.

        • Robin says:

          Lindsay was murdered that’s what went wrong and murder is the biggest sin of all. Why would you say something went very wrong? What does that mean? Shirley you have an explanation for such a comment.

          • Robin says:

            Good points except for one
            CTD.. “I think it is big of you to want to believe in the SPD” NO it’s naive. For reasons you have stated it is lack of integrity, the SPD were given orders to harass Richard Atwell. The SPD have effd up priorities not lack of funding. They obviously chose to spend their budget in ways not conducive to solving a major murder or in acting with integrity for the public who they work for. Who are the criminals? Quit putting lipstick on pigs 🐷.

            • ConnectTheDots says:

              I agree. Naïve would have been more accurate. Maybe even deceptive. I’ve learned though that it is better to be kind so that you can have the conversation.

      • DJ Anderson says:

        You’re giving the PD way too much credit. What do competent agencies/ detectives do when they’re at a dead-end? They start all over from the beginning! This PD is corrupt and just cashes in for pension. Way too stupid and lazy to figure it out, yet most on here have!

    • dag-asle says:

      Should hire a team of ex military to take these assholes out. I would dontate to this. This case could be solved,but the police are arrogant and incompetant.

      • Robin says:

        I would donate too. It’s time poor Lindsay should RIP and her family could think about healing. I like you Dag -asle. Maybe we could hire some mercenaries to take care of the business the SPD can’t seem to do.

  16. Michael says:

    I just realized that on one particular point there is proof, flat proof Jason is lieing.
    He said he got a text back from Lindsay saying something to the effect ” gotta go they are here “,
    implying the buyers are there and it time to start the showing.
    Jason goes on to say when he arrives well after that text he sees a man just going in, and here comes the lie, the lie is he thinks that means the showing is just starting. Well no Jason, you admit you were informed sometime ago through text the couple had arrived and the showing was starting. Now im haven’t check exactly how many minutes had passed from Jason being informed the couple was there thus the showing was starting, and his arrival and seeing the man just going in then, but now it was far more time than it would take to shake hands and walk to the door and go in.
    Horsley if it is true you are dirty and fear the Zailos will say that if you press them, can’t you just fall back on saying they can’t be trusted or beileved. You know I’m even willing to be even if you are caught up in something the public would be willing to give it a pass if it means we can have justice for Lindsay.

    • Svetlana says:

      That is good observation about Jason’s slip up. I guess he forgot the order as liars often do. How much longer can this man be free? It’s been too long. Something has to give. I want to see this lying son of a gun in jail.

      I wonder how many people gave information but the police brushed it all aside for some reason. They did mention in one of the interviews about the huge amount, maybe thousands, of information they got from people so what did they do with that? Sit on it?

  17. Julie says:

    Just want to send you and your family love and prayers. Lindsay was very lucky to have a father like you who keeps her memory alive. I am so sorry that this terrible tragedy happened but I hope you find comfort in memories with her and the trust that you’ll see her again someday on the other side. Stay healthy and stay safe!

  18. Svetlana says:

    So Michelle Lum was an associate of one of the Zailo brothers, perhaps both, and people said she had a blonde wig and lived close to DeSousa Place. What happened to that wig? Did police blunder with that too?

  19. anna says:

    Jeff Buziak, i am curious to know what any psychics may have told you about her murder? i understand you might have reasons as to why you’d not want to share such info.

    • Jeff Buziak, father says:

      I have no problem sharing my truth. I spoke to many psychics after Constable Horsley of Saanich police accused me of holding a witch hunt when he was interviewed by Crime Watch Daily. I decided to go to the witches as he suggested. I spoke to probably close to 20 psychics from all around North America. Once I made that decision to speak to them it was as if I opened my door for business as they were contacting me as well.
      100% said mother and boyfriend involved along with a police officer with a name like ho hor horse…..horsey. They all said it was a very scary situation because of the police officer involved. The ones I spoke to in Victoria were very scared and did not want to be involved due to Horsley and Shirley Zailo involvement and fear for their lives because of those two.
      There you go. Believe it or not but that is what they all basically said. After 6 or 8 of them saying the same thing I became concerned then after about 14 I thought what the hell really goes on in Greater Victoria in the shadows. They murdered Lindsay and have covered it up for over 12 years I know that for sure. Lindsay’s murder then followed by the bungling antics of 4 police chiefs with the current one the worst, 3 Mayors with the first and current like ostriches with their heads buried in the sand, 4 or 5 heads of the file at Saanich police and of course the cop with the name like a ho ho hor horsey…..who is feared and portrays behaviours more gangster than cop.
      Are psychics our truth sayers?

      • micheal says:

        The fact Horsley himself isn’t calling for another agency to take the file i think is evidence of exactly what you say.
        Think about it if you, I or anyone where in his shoes and the father of a murder victim and the international public were suggesting I at best was incompantent at worst corrupt, wouldn’t you say I’m gonna show them and defend myself, im gonna get the best possible agents on this case and show them its not me being incompantent or corrupt. I know I would.
        I build houses for a living, and if I was truly doing my job correctly yet my client didn’t beileve so and the greater public didn’t either , I would be the first and the loudest to say ok let’s get the best experts here, you can even pick them and let them do it and let’s see if its a better product, and when its not I want an apology. but you dont see Horsley doing that.
        Now I know Horsley falls back on how it been reviewed by the RCMP. well sorry thats not the same thing. I’m sure all they do is see if anything is glaringly wrong. Well sorry just because nothing is glaringly wrong doesn’t mean everything is alright.
        Anyhow Jeff I wish strength , and I probably meaningless but I have had a werid feeling for a few weeks not something big is going to shake loose in this soon.

        • Robin says:

          Exactly that is what someone with integrity would do. We are not seeing any integrity come from the Saanich Police Chiefs, the Mayors or Chris Horsely. This is obviously a cover up. The Saanich Police and Police Board are corrupt!
          Lindsay’s story will be a movie in time, maybe then they will solve it!
          Well said Michael

        • Wyatt says:

          A lecture on integrity…. from the very guy from Connecticut who thinks “fairness” should be applied to killer SZ. I don’t think so well said.

          • Michael says:

            It is important to be fair and respectful to truth regardless even if that truth happens to invalid an insult against someone we hate.
            You need to realize and understand something, and that something is when you put out false information about someone people will be less likely to beileve and trust what you are saying about that person. you want people to be able to say, well this person is seeing things clearly and fairly and isn’t just twisting everything cause that have a bias. So yes be fair to Shirley, Jason and whoever else. I have no worries that we can still get justice while being fair to them. In fact being fair and truthful about the accused is the only way to get true justice. In the end id much prefer to see them locked up with no one able to say they weren’t given a fair deal. Im sorry you disagree.

        • dag-asle says:

          RCMP is exactly what the name stand for. Some riding goobers. I dont know. Canada seems like it has a huge problem with corrupt police.

          • Robin says:

            And most stuff doesn’t get picked up by the media. Many people are given money and told to stfu too from the RCMP. I know of 8 women who got 360,000 $ each plus pension but were silenced. I personally know one of the women. It’s a fucked up mess.

      • Svetlana says:

        Plus Shirley Zailo had a police officer as a boyfriend. How convenient. He may know a thing or two.

  20. Brett says:

    How about the house being a target. No one would buy a house that a horrific murder happened.

    • OceanWaves says:

      Jason leaves his hands in his pockets during the video interviews inside the house. Body language experts would say that is a sign that he was not expecting anyone to believe what he was saying.
      From SHC autobody in Saanich to 1702 DeSouza, that’s a >>>>>> minimum <<<>>>>> 20 minute or 21 minute ride <<<<< depending on the route. For me to believe that the closed circuit television at 5:30pm at SHC showed Jason there at that actual time, and then he arrives at 1702 DeSousa just 15 minutes not 20 minutes or more later (on a Saturday evening when I am sure there is shopping, dinner and even traffic) is a hard sell.
      Did Jason and Oatman fly rather than drive? or were they closer (much closer?) by the property than what they are claiming?
      Were Jason and Nikki in a relationship? Hooking up?
      Who is this Aurik DeSousa? did have have the hots for Lindsay? Who was Aurik dating at the time? Someone? No one?

      • see closely says:

        Body language experts?You mean like the ones the CNN had spouting nonsense about the meeting of ex-president Obama and Russian president Putin.
        They were all praising Obama’s body language comparing to Putin’s body language ,yet-in reality Putin used Obama as a toilet paper regarding the Syria.
        Don’t trust any “experts” especially those “talking heads” like they use on CNN and MSNBC.

        • micheal says:

          Amen see closley, Police often use experts like that and even polygraph experts to reach the ” expert” conclusion they desire.

        • OceanWaves says:

          Further: Let’s say we are catching Jason and Oatman as the killer (s) based on time and time alone. The video that was made at a daylighted intersection at SHC is a fraud, because it would have been dark before 5:15pm that night (I read this blog). We see this note about a text from Jason to Lindsay on Investigation Discovery (https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=OFOzEB0yyiE ) . So in an earlier post (Dec. 4th) I say that Jason is lying about leaving SHC at 5:30PM and getting to 1702 De Sousa by 5:45PM when it would have been 5:50PM or later on a Saturday night . Based on the info on Investigation Discovery video Jason texts Lindsay at 5:29pm and says “I am 9 minutes away”. Let’s say Jason is telling the truth in this instance, but only about the time, not the location. He wants everyone to believe he is leaving SHC at 5:29pm. In reality if he was 9 minutes away he is actually at Shelbourne Street and Cedar Hill Road. Not SHC. And if 9 min. away at 5:29 puts him at the house at 5:38pm. Not 5:45PM which is 7 minutes later. Said another way, all 4 statements Jason made cannot be true which are “I am at SHC” and “I am 9 minutes away” and “I left SHC at 5:30PM and arrived at 5:45 on DeSousa” . Some are true and some are lies. I wonder who or what he knows on Shelbourne and Cedar Hill Road? or if there was another non SHC direction he was coming from 9 minutes away?

      • Robin says:

        Jason had his hands in his pockets because he was trying to see if he had balls like other guys.

      • dag-asle says:

        How long after the crime was jason there? It should still be a crimescene.

    • Michael says:

      I respectfully disagree the house was a target.
      but on that line of thinking, there are plenty of people who would not care about living in a house after such a terrible incident. such as the person currently doing so.
      on the othet side of coin if the house was a target it could be the opposite, purposely done there to drive down cost of home for a buyer.
      but again I highly doubt the target was the house, no it was lindsay.
      .

  21. anna says:

    This is what i suspect, her bf’s drug dealers were coming around, go it could be that her bf owed some drug money debt and they killed her as his punishment, their way of collecting on his debt Or they felt she stood in their way of coming around making deals with her bf. yet at times i suspect others in this…i dont know but i hope she has justice someday, getting away with this is just unacceptable.

  22. Jeff Buziak, father says:

    Lindsay Buziak Murder Contacts.

    For all you people who have questions about various details in the ongoing saga of Lindsay’s unsolved murder rather than fight amongst each other or guess please contact the following individuals who I am certain would be more than happy to answer all or any of the questions which continue to puzzle you.

    Saanich police: Chief Scott Green who has held all senior positions at Saanich police since Lindsay was murdered and solely responsible to see Lindsay’s savage murder is solved in a timely manner or commit harakiri in shame.

    sgreen@saanichpolice.ca

    Lindsay’s boss at the time, her direct supervisor and one of the last people to interact with Lindsay, Shirley Zailo.

    shirleyzailo@shaw.ca

    Lindsay’s boyfriend at the time of her death, son of the above, and probably the last or one of the last to interact with Lindsay before her savage murder. Jason Zailo

    jason@modernmortgagegroup.ca

    I’m certain any of the above will gladly respond to all of your inquiries.

    Of course, if I can answer any of your questions I most certainly will.
    Jeff Buziak, father

    jeffbuziak@hotmail.com

    Thank you very much for your support.

  23. Personz says:

    Racquet Quocksister knows who did this she was high on cocaine the other night bragging about it. She a fetnayl dealing loser in town. Drives a mazzerati but has no real job? Hmm

    • Robin says:

      You mean Racquel Quoksister I guess. Maybe the SPD will pull her over and actually do their job trying to find out what she knows!

      • Wyatt says:

        Ok, I’ll bite…… who is this person? I don’t recall her name (odd one at that) being mentioned before or I missed it. I googled the name, especially the last, very odd name, and the only thing hitting was for some low-life drug dealers/associates. Do her loose lips have anything to do with the killers or is she just spewing drug induced crapola?

        • Robin says:

          The only thing I know is she comes from a sleezy car salesman/dealership background in Dicktoria. Her grandfather (dead) plus uncle or father were/are probably on the take in some way. She looks like a spoiled brat. If she’s driving a Maserati and doing cocaine and not OD-ing from fentanyl she probably knows the sleezy drug people. Since she is blabbing about knowing who murdered Lindsay the cops need to get on her ass! Pull that car over ffs. No clue who she was before post was made. I thought it was a name for a clown and seems I was correct.

          • ConnectTheDots says:

            The SPD had no problem pulling over Richard Atwell multiple times when he was running for mayor of Saanich.

            • Wyatt says:

              So true CTD, they certainly didn’t require ANY probable cause x4 (if I recall) it is soooo obvious the corruption at SPD. Why are all those who are tasked with ensuring corruption doesn’t embed itself in law enforcement not accountable? I’m pretty sure they’ve received hundreds of complaints and reports in regards to SPD and their corruption but everyone has their head up their …. or sorry… in the sand. I think I will embark on another round of complaints to our newly elected NDP and that pesky Police Board which is tasked to address this very scenario. Hey Mayor Hinds, or is it Hindsly, or Horsley….. heck the name ain’t worth the memory chip! Off to write some more complaints…..

              • Robin says:

                These are the things we need to point out in our emls. Never let the powers that be forget that we know WTF is going on. Another round of emls for everyone!!!!

              • ConnectTheDots says:

                That’s right, it was at least three times, I think four. With no cause what so ever. What was even more shocking is that no one said anything about criminal harassment even though Richard Atwell was speaking about it on the radio. Not one person said, wait a minute, they can’t do that. And even more importantly, why are they doing that. The SPD also endorsed the sitting mayor, Frank Leonard, on the radio which is not their place to do. It is not their job or place to tell the voting public who they would like to see voted back in. And, as far as I know, nobody said anything about why they were doing that. Weird to say the least. And then, when much to their dismay Richard was voted in, they and Saanich council tried to freeze him out. Again, even though Richard was outspoken about this on the radio as far as I know no one with authority called Saanich out on it. How dare they try to undermine a duly elected official. What the hell is going on in Saanich?

          • Wyatt says:

            Dicktoria…. 😂. Love it! Perfect reference to all the dicks at SPD…. no?
            Interesting info. Thanks for that. Here’s hoping fentanyl finds its way to her location.

            • Robin says:

              There’s a drug hierarchy in Dictoria, it’s gets cut the further down the chain of powerful people. Look who OD’s. The lower u r on the hierarchy the more fentanyl you get mixed in with your cocaine. That’s how it works.

  24. Haah says:

    Ima fuckin Loser Jeff I hope u find the truth because you deserve it
    The lives ruined should all be pointing fingers at shitty cops not doing their jobs

    Maybe if I weren’t such a big loser and help women out sometimes your daughter wouldn’t have found herself in this predikamant.

    Bottom line losers like me who deserves to get smacked the fuck around for the shit we get others into being reject losers.

    Merry Xmas from a loser

  25. Brittany says:

    Is anyone aware who bought the 900,000 listing that seemed similar?

    • Wyatt says:

      Irrelevant. And it’s a narrative provided by steroid boy himself and no collaborating party. Another self serving claim and while it’s fairly easy to validate (the sale) no one seems o have taken that initiative. (Evidence)

      • Rosanne says:

        Lindsay was only staying with Jason because she was waiting for some commissions to get to her. I would think this sale was important and could have changed her life. If money laundering was what Lindsay saw, this sale could have been an up close and personal look at that, which gave her the proof she would need to cause some trouble. It would also cause Lindsay to not believe if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is as it has been said she had sold a house under similar circumstances before and I would think it was this one they were talking about. Every tiny thing that brought Lindsay to her killer would have significance, should have been looked into and by now solved this crime.

        • Michael says:

          Like a dateline I just saw last night where someone simply posting on Facebook how the lyrics from a song reminded them of someone , lead to a string of events that cracked a 20 year old case, but he isn’t. He also seems to miss what he repeats has not brought justice so maybe he should relax a little and let others bring up different things that may. Nor does he realize that any discussion pretty much is good discussion as it keeps people engaged and justice for lindsay on their minds.

    • Svetlana says:

      That probably gave the Zailos the idea.

    • ConnectTheDots says:

      I think this is a red herring.

  26. micheal says:

    Now the point of this post isn’t too dwell on what could have been done to stop this from ever happening. My point isn’t people around lindsay failed her. No the murder is the person at fault for this. That being said the point of this is to show why it may not be a “professional hit”
    For the life of me can’t think of any plausible reason someone having such werid feelings about a showing wouldn’t at the very least ask a name for the couple in so many phone calls, let alone ask ” what business is he transferring in” where you transferring from etc., it makes no sense. So much so I starting to feel one of those things cant be true.
    Either she did know the couples name and perhaps something about them made her not really want to do business with them and this is the source of her conflicted feelings … Or ( what I DONT THINK) she didn’t really have feelings of reservations about this showing. More over not a single person lindsay expressed her reservations too asked lindsay ” what did they say there name was?” Not 1, person thinks to ask her that. Not one person says when she says I don’t know her name, that she needs to at least ask that.
    lindsay is having someone at her office look up the phone number to see if it can provide more information about the couple but doesn’t ask a name? She is calling a former client or clients to see if they referred her. Well what was she gonna ask that client ” hey did you ever referr me to ……. oo thats right I dont even have their name to ask you.
    One must admit this is really fishy about this it just doesn’t add up and is a big stroke of luck for the killers.
    I realize hindsight is 20-20, but can’t get over the fact someone who desperately wants lindsay dead risks this entire plan falling apart over this one simple thing. she requests their name and places a call to the business and asks them ” hi im a realtor and I got a call that made me a little suspicious, do you have a ” Jon Doe” you are transferring to the B.C area. Sure some may say the business couldnt answer perhaps they aren’t allowed to disclose personal information about their staff like that. but at least try. and a response like that alone would basically confirm the man does work there, because if he didn’t they would be able to answer no. since he doesn’t work there they are not disclosing any information about an employee of theirs. plus even if the business did say they can’t disclose said information with out the employee consent lindsay could simply ask the callers to give their consent to their employer to disclose said information. I know of I was buying a house from a young lady and she made such a request to me I would say, no offense taken at all thats completely understandable ill gladly do that.
    That being said i don’t think a professional killer is going to risk this entire operation failing apart over a simple thing like that, that frankly I’m surprised didn’t happen.

    • see closely says:

      This is eminently right,in my opinion-micheal

    • Rosanne says:

      I have to disagree with calling someone’s workplace to check on them.A google of the business to make sure it was real, maybe.A couple of reasons why. This man was going to be the new guy and a call asking about him or checking his truthfulness could have started rumors and caused him difficulty when his work was not involved and just being the reason for his move. To me that seems like going a bit overboard. Secondly, if a call like this had come into Lindsay’s office before they contacted her asking about her personal business she most likely would have found out. If I took a call asking about another employee I would tell them about it. There are weirdos and stalkers out there nowadays. It would have creeped her out because this is intrusive and not something generally done. If you think about this, it could have very easily been Lindsay meeting a couple and them buying a house from her and during that process both sides would come to know each other.

      • Michael says:

        I’m not following you, also not sure if you understood what i said.. if lindsay called the man’s business and said ” I’m a realtor and just got a call that sounds too good to be true, and I simply want to confirm jon doe works for you” what rumor would that start? she would not be saying there is anything off about the guy anything he is saying or do, she would simply express she has a werid feeling with in herself.
        if the work is the reason for his move then the work is very much involved, in fact his work is the sole reason he would need a new house. Also in most corporate transfers the work place is often directly part of the real estate transaction, either purchasing the new home or guarantee the sale of existing home.
        I dont know maybe it me I own a business and if I received a call from a young lady who had an odd feeling and just wanted to make sure she was safe by confirming an employee of mine was real and being transferred i would tell her yes , to make sure it went smooth as possible for my employee.
        but non the less this is all a secondary to my principal point, which is i have a hard time believing in 10 calls and with a bad feeling she never asked for a name
        of t directly involved in the real estate process.

        • lbmurder says:

          Lindsay was new in the business and under the direct supervision of her boss which you could ask these questions which trouble you. Lindsay’s boss was Shirley Zailo.

        • Wyatt says:

          The simple version without all the fanfare if this scenario was to be executed is to simply call that employer’s office, ask to speak to the person whom you wish and if the employer says… just a minute… or …. no one here by that name etc.etc…. you got your answer without violating “privacy” laws. But seriously, this is a moot point at this stage and isn’t worth a hill of beans for discussion or debate. I think it’s irrelevant. Next.

          • micheal says:

            I dont know if its irrelevant, I can’t explain why. but I think her being concerned over meeting this couple yet supposedly not once asking a name in 10 calls makes no sense, and could have some importance.
            And im sorry wyatt, I get your a keyboard warrior but you dont run this blog like you like to think and act. Now if Jeff said anything at all I would honor and respect anything he requested. But you wyatt are just another person on this blog. But I have noticed you do have quite the urge to want to control this blog, it’s odd to me actually.
            anyhow in the future if something isn’t worth discussion or debate For you than you dont have to engage of discussion or debate like you did, so I guess you did act feel it was worth discussion.
            perhaps you think i or others sit here and think oooo gee Wyatt said its irrelevant and next, better listen to Wyatt,but we don’t hate to burst your bubble.
            I gotta say everyone else seems very cooperative and respectful of each other here, than there is wyatt, the blog troll who I seen be rude to many people here.

            • Louise says:

              Interesting, you are extremely judgmental and have a difficult time with others trying to assist you in moving forward rather than rehashing old debated theories. I think we can all agree that it is the Zailo’s who orchestrated, planned and executed Lindsay and Horsley is instrumental in covering it up and corruption. I think it was rather rude and disrespectful of you to refer to Wyatt as a troll or control freak, he’s always stated HIS synopsis, he has ALWAYS been a solid supporter for the justice for Lindsay and if he seems a little rough around the edges for you, than maybeYOU should pass on commenting to or about him. In fact, I recall a couple posts where he actually “praised” you for a few of your posts. It’s too bad you’re so sensitive to your needs. Time to advocate to get this file from the SPD and into the hands of professionals.

              • micheal says:

                As far as old theories I have read some of his old theories and they dont add up.
                now I maybe wrong but he believes Lindsay arrived at 450-500, and was killed soon after.
                he beileves it was Shirley or the other killer who activated the lock box at 530 then put the cell phone back in Lindsay pocket at 541.
                here is why that doesn’t add up,
                if she was kill at 5 pm or soon after your saying the they just hung out in a brutal crime scene for 40 mins?
                so they are upstairs killed Lindsay its now about 5 pm, they hang out for half hour doing what? just saying to themselves the more time we spend in a crime scene the less likely we are to get caught? then at 530 they go down to lock box activate it hang out for 11 more minutes then go back upstairs to put phone on lindsays? doesn’t make sense.
                maybe if the phone and lockbox times were reversed it would make sense.phone in pocket and then lockbox on way out.
                more over I’ve noticed a ridiculous double standard which is when someone disagrees with his theory he demands evidence to prove it,, yet he doesn’t require the same evidence for his own theory.
                Sorry I think Sz orchestrated the killing but was not the killer.

                • ConnectTheDots says:

                  I don’t think the murderers would have had a problem hanging out at the murder scene for 40 minutes. There was no risk of being caught as it was a secure situation and they made sure that there was no significant noise made. Is it possible that they wanted to make it look like Lindsay arrived later as Robin says ( hence the lie about Lindsay going home to change ) so that they could make it look like there is no way that the murderers could have made the 6:00 ferry? I believe that neighbor Terry Shein asked his son to be on a later ferry than originally planned so that he could arrive to pick him up at I think 5:45ish. Shirley and maybe Ryan could have stayed behind to access the lock box and then access it again to throw off the timeline before going to their respective near by locations, putting the phone back in Lindsay’s pocket before leaving. Jason parks and plays musical cars so that Cohen doesn’t have a direct view of things and also so that he can make sure no one else interrupts the murder scene. Jason, when sure that the coast is clear, then discovers Lindsay. After the police arrive Shirley walks up to maintain control over the ensuing mayhem and investigation.

                  • PandaBear says:

                    Cohen is the key – he makes me sick for being a pansy.

                  • micheal says:

                    I suppose the murderers werent worried about hanging out in a crime scene for much longer than needed to complete their sick goal. But every second one spends in a crime scene does increase the risk of getting caught.
                    Also I thought as far as we know the lock box was only accessed once in that time period with Lindsay phone.
                    But still it doesnt make sense to me the lock box is being activated at 529 and the pocket dial is happening it 541. I dont see them waiting around for 11 mins for no reason.
                    I still firmly feel there was a real couple she met with that evening. That it was her activating the lockbox and starting the showing at 530 and was killed at 541.
                    If the witnesses are making up seeing this couple it doesnt make any sense for them to give the description they did, from the dress too the fact it looked like the lady maybe wearing a wig. When people lie they want to introduce as few details as possible they need to remember. If a witness or witnesses were going to be invovled and make up seeing this couple i think they would simply say , I saw what looked like a man and a woman and thats about all i can tell you.
                    Plus i dont think anyone has explained why lindsay showed up 30 to 40 mins early for a showing in the first place. I suppose it could be she wanted to become fimilar with the property prior to showing it to her clients , but still even then it doesnt take that long to walk through a house.
                    I also dont understand why it seems to be some people feel the existence of this couple would somehow negate invovlement of Sz and or JZ. I dont see it that way at all.
                    To be honest it even makes me a little uncomfortable how some ( not saying you) are very, very very set on getting any and all suspicion or even discussion of this couple being there from taking place.
                    Especially since its simply a fact no one knows for sure and its very plausible and in my eyes likely they were there. I could understand not taking part in those discussions if one feels it is simply a red herring, or even taking part in them and simply making a case why it is one thinks the couple was never there. But it just feels off to me the people who are very set on ending anyone discussing or looking at the couple, its as if they have a personal stake in keeping this couple out of anyones mind, when talk of them does nothing to hurt the cause of justice of lindsay.

                    • Jeff Buziak, father says:

                      I personally spoke to one of the so-called witnesses whom I believe to be very sincere and concerned. The witness was driving by at 5:30 pm, glanced over for maybe a few seconds and saw someone they believe to be greeting two people. The witness saw 3 people. Not Lindsay, not anyone in particular….they saw 3 people then had to return their focus to the road and driving so it could have been anyone they saw…anyone.

        • Rosanne says:

          I will have to stick with a professional calling a workplace to check their client out behind their back and not preapproved is stepping over a boundary. If she needed to get ahold of him, calling and asking if they had a business number she could reach him at might be acceptable and give her some information. That they knew of him and he did work there. If he had been a real customer Lindsay could have lost a million dollar deal by messing where she should not have been. The Saanich police going to Jeff Buziak’s workplace was so out of line and unprofessional. There is NO way they can defend that action. It was wrong. Just my opinion but the relationship was at too early of a stage to start crossing lines. In these times it could be a stalker asking about one of your employees. I did work in medical offices and confidentiality rules were spelled out clearly.

          • Michael says:

            I hear ya Roseanne, i appreciate you being able to discuss things even when we see it differently like a respectful mature adult.

  27. micheal says:

    I had high hope for the crime phones, but have a feeling they are a dead end, maybe they simply paid some homeless guy to go buy them.
    or some drug dealer or something of the sort bulk bought a bunch of them and just says ” yeah I bought a ton of those gave them to my customers to use to contact me,

    • Godfather says:

      Drug dealers buy in bulk and they know where to buy to get the least amount of attention. They like to buy in busy Vancouver. They are bought by homeless and street people for a small fee ALL the time, a couple here a couple there. Price of doing nefarious business. Criminals never let their supply of cell phones diminish. They are bought in many different places all the time. They are thrown away like asswipe.

  28. T. Selvamani says:

    The killer is still alive, the killer planned the murder and sent the professional killer to kill her. The killer updating every on this investigation. Kindly check the person how Visited this Website frequently. More possibilities are there for the killer to visit this website.

    “*The person planned this murder and sent the professional killer to murder her.

    * The person is very very close to her life circle. “

  29. T. Selvamani says:

    Theory:1
    Lindsay Buziak, This is a well Planned murder by her Husband. 95% her husband planned this Murder. I reduced 5% because he not killed her.

    Theory: 2
    There is a necessity, She has to be murder within 2 or 3 days. They taken away somethings from her or They want to stop her from doing something. They want her to die soon for sure. (She already involved in something that’s why she suspected the Phone call. ). I won’t believe the text message conversations. The murdere are sent by the very close circle to her. The lady and the man are Professional Murders sent by her Well Known person. She knows the up-normal things, because of, What she has done already? Victim of Revenge (Or) Victim of What she going to do? To stop it.

    “The Murderer is very very close in her Life circle” *100% sure.

    • Svetlana says:

      They stopped her from going to Vancouver to the birthday party. Who was at that party?

      • Wyatt says:

        Who’s “they?” I don’t think anyone “stopped” Lindsay from any function, if she wanted to go, she would and could have still gone. Nobody sinister there as I understand they were HER friends for a bachelorette party. All women. I feel your grasping at straws here AKA a red herring – just saying. It’s the Stupid Police we need to get off this case. They couldn’t solve the crime of nuts stolen by a squirrel so we need to pressure them to release this file! We know who killed Lindsay, we just got to find that investigative team who are good at their job and aren’t dirty or corrupt.

        • Svetlana says:

          They, meaning Zailos in regards to TSelvamani’s theory. Plus Shirley Zailo did those hand to throat gestures to her friends after the murder. It’s like she thinks that some of her friends knew something. And it’s like they wanted her to go fast because they suspect she was about to tell on them and most likely are the ones who removed Facebook messages. They are hiding some things in their dirty closet.

          How stupid can police be not to see that?

          He hands over her laptop with messages deleted till the day after her murder. If they could of thrown it away they would have done so but they knew it would look extremely suspicious so they deleted the evidence and pretended they were so innocent by handing over the laptop.

          Disgusting!

          • ConnectTheDots says:

            I believe one of Lindsay’s close friends did know something. I believe she was one of the girls in the car? Jeff? It was posted years ago that she witnessed Jason overhearing Lindsay telling her, while they were in Lindsay and Jason’s condo, that Lindsay was going to leave him as soon as some real estate transactions went through. Shirley was very aware that she had seen that as well as being privy to Jason’s reaction to over hearing that conversation. Apparently when Lindsay discovered him listening from the bedroom, Lindsay and her friend ran from the condo in fear and would not come back for many hours despite Jason calling her over and over again. After not being able to reach Lindsay he made one call to his mother. I believe that is when the plotting began. Apparently when Lindsay finally did go back, against her friends advice, Jason acted as if nothing had happened. As if he had not heard Lindsay telling her friend that Lindsay was going to leave him soon. I also think that it was that same friend that received the phone call very late at night from a woman with a strange fake sounding accent. When she woke up enough to realize it was probably the same accent that Lindsay had heard she panicked and quickly hung up. She then tried dialing the number back to find out who it was and after repeatedly dialing the number many times finally someone picked up. Guess who it was? Yup, you guessed it, SZ. When asked why she was calling one of Lindsay’s friends, someone Shirley didn’t really even know, she said that Jason must have put her phone number in her contacts without her knowing it and that she had accidently dialed her instead of a coworker with the same name. Yeah, right. 1) Why would Jason be putting his girlfriends, girlfriends contact info into his mothers phone contacts? 2) Without her knowledge for no reason at all? Nice try.

            • see closely says:

              It is very interesting that maternal branch of Lindsay’s family is never commenting in this blog.My take is that they do not agree with the “facts” and tenor of opinions by goofs like me.Sorry

  30. Wyatt says:

    Ok. I just have to throw this out there….. first let it be known I don’t have a religious bone in my skelton… I shall claim… I believe in science. Having said that, I do “believe” in spirit. I like to think our dear departed still hover amongst the ones they love and sometimes give us a subtle sign of that spirit, or presence, if you will. So here’s where I’m going with this … I could NEVER purchase a home or live on the property where such a violent, rage infused, planned killing took place. NEVER. So what I read previously (hope I got that correct) was that Desousa retained the murder house and most recently his son (weird name) Argyle or something similar, apparently is residing in the murder mansion. I like to think that Lindsay visits there from time to time, just to stir the pot – so to speak. Maybe she wisps a breeze of freezing air across their beds while they lay awake causing them a fright or scare or just plain “creeped out.” Maybe those vehicle keys that they can’t locate will never be found. That item that was put on the counter has been missing forever! A lamp will flicker without cause. I sure hope she puts in a few “creeped out” moments for us all.
    Here’s to you Lindsay 🍷 you may be gone but you will NEVER be forgotten. RIP young lady.

  31. eight says:

    Tristin Hopper posted this message on Twitter last Monday:

    “For those asking, I am no longer editor of Capital Daily because they fired me. It, uh, wasn’t amicable.”

    Hopefully this will not impact the assignment with Zander Sherman looking into Lindsay’s case.

    Regarding his work so far, there are many intriguing aspects of the information in the documents he’s obtained, and many takes on where they may lead. Wyatt provided a good walk through them this morning.

    Two that jump out at me are the fact that the identity of the phones’ owner(s) is known, and Lindsay sold a $900K listing under similar circumstances just a month prior.

    Needless to say, the reason the identity of the owner(s) of the burner phones has not led to charges must include quite a twist. It should have been a key turning point in solving the case but apparently wasn’t. Even if they were communal phones used by several people the list couldn’t be so long as to preclude discovering who made the calls. And whoever made the calls is at the very least a conspirator. If they turned out to be deceased it’s still very hard to imagine why this wasn’t a major breakthrough.

    All along we’ve been given to understand that this showing was really a big deal to Lindsay because of the dollar value. For instance in the third podcast of the “Brainscratch” interviews, her father says, “…she called me immediately when she got the phone call because she was so excited. This would have been her premier deal of her career so far.”

    Now we learn that she may have successfully had just as big a deal in similar circumstances shortly before this one. If that is true, it may explain a) – why she went ahead with this one, and b) – where the conspirators got the idea for the ruse. Again pointing to people aware of her personal situation. People close to her.

    Hopefully Mr. Sherman is allowed to continue his pursuits.

    • ConnectTheDots says:

      “Needless to say, the reason the identity of the owner(s) of the burner phones has not led to charges must include quite a twist”
      That’s a nice way of putting it…..I think we will have to remove the case from the SPD to find out what that “twist” is.
      I hope that Tristan Hopper was not fired because of allowing Zander Sherman to pursue justice for Lindsay. Right now, imo, he poses the biggest threat the SPD has ever had with regards to someone being able to pry the lid off of this case. We need to find out more about this and also if Zander is now going to be told he can no longer pursue this case and or be fired also. I would not be surprised at all if that is what is happening.

    • Wyatt says:

      This is suspicious. No? I’m not a Twitter follower so thank you eight for advising us of this outcome. I say suspicious because I did not immediately connect Tristin’s dismissal to be connected to Zander’s research until I read CTD’s suggestion. Is it fair to say that Tristin’s dismissal was somehow orchestrated via SPD connections? (Mayor, Chief Green, Police Board etc.) Was Capital Daily “threatened” with charges of obstruction due to their story? Is Zander getting so close to prying the lid off Pandora’s box that Horsley, Green etc. are starting to sweat? Are they (SPD) trying to shut up and control the paper? Like they do with the Times Columist? Are they threatening them as they did to Jeff? Tristin has extensive journalism so this dismissal seems rather suspect and if he’s looking at wrongful dismissal charges based on SPD threats than he is limited to disclosure at this time. Interesting and disturbing situation. 🧐

      • ConnectTheDots says:

        Yes, I agree. Disturbing. This is exactly what I was hoping would not happen but thought that it probably would. B.C. is so corrupt and has been for a long time.

      • ConnectTheDots says:

        We need to pay close attention to what is happening here.

    • Marilyn Sanders says:

      I wish Lindsay would have told her dad what she saw that she wasnt supposed to. There is no doubt in my mind that shirley and jadon were behind this whole thing. I would like to know why the sannich police have not moved on this case, are they prorecting someone or are they being bought off? I can’t think of a police dept not pursue ing so many obvious leads.

  32. Jeff Buziak, father says:

    Murder Murder Murder

    Lindsay Buziak Unsolved Murder 02/02/08

    Saanich, B.C. Canada

    Why is murder allowed in Saanich BC? “Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse, especially the unlawful killing of another human with malice aforethought. This state of mind may, depending upon the jurisdiction, distinguish murder from other forms of unlawful homicide, such as manslaughter. Manslaughter is killing committed in the absence of malice, brought about by reasonable provocation, or diminished capacity. Involuntary manslaughter, where it is recognized, is a killing that lacks all but the most attenuated guilty intent, recklessness.”

    “Most societies consider murder to be an extremely serious crime, and thus that a person convicted of murder should receive harsh punishments for the purposes of retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, or incapacitation. In most countries, a person convicted of murder generally faces a long-term prison sentence, a life sentence, and even a death penalty may be imposed.”
    “Most societies consider murder to be an extremely serious crime” Why do Saanich police allow it in their municipality that is part of the capital province of British Columbia, Victoria, BC and not consider murder an extremely serious crime? Are Saanich police naïve, dumb, useless or corrupted supporting criminals? They are certainly not upholding the law in Saanich, BC.

    “In Canada, murder is defined in the Criminal Code, a statute passed by the Parliament of Canada that applies uniformly across the country. Murder is the most serious category of culpable homicide, the others being manslaughter and infanticide.” In Saanich, BC, the Saanich police do nothing about murder, say nothing about murder and vigorously defend and attack anyone who questions their attitude towards them for doing nothing about murder. Basically they do nothing about murder except defend, their abysmal reputation and occasionally provide excuses and explanations why they allow murder in Saanich with no consequences.

    In Canada murder is an indictable offence and the most serious criminal act in Canada. “Indictable offences capture crimes such as murder, manslaughter, robbery, extortion, cocaine trafficking and other serious crimes.” Well the other indictable offences also appear to be allowed in Saanich, BC as well. Well known drug dealers operate in Saanich without impunity. Why? Saanich police. Saanich police claim Lindsay had criminal elements on her phone list but yet none of those people are in jail. Why? Saanich police. Saanich police know these people by name and so does anyone who grew up in Saanich but yet they are allowed to continue by Saanich police. In Saanich it appears anything goes and is overlooked or supported by Saanich police.

    With Saanich police failing to uphold the law it appears there could be a very relevant case they are an accessory to the murder of Lindsay Buziak and other indictable offences. “An accessory is distinguished from an accomplice, who normally is present at the crime and participates in some way. An accessory must generally have knowledge that a crime is being committed, will be committed, or has been committed. A person with such knowledge may become an accessory by helping or encouraging the criminal in some way. The assistance to the criminal may be of any type, including emotional or financial assistance as well as physical assistance or concealment.” Are Saanich police assisting the people who murdered Lindsay Buziak? Are Saanich police concealing anything about Lindsay’s murder? YES they most certainly are. They know exactly what happened, why Lindsay was murdered and by who but refuse to take action to the extent they are defending information about the criminals who viciously murdered Lindsay in court.

    Tell me, Who are the real criminals in Saanich, B.C. CANADA?

    No Justice – No Respect

    • see closely says:

      The AG Prosecution office of Minister David Eby is guilty-in my opinion -for preventing( for its own need),to bring Lindsay’s murder case to the rightful end.Who, or what is preventing AG Prosecution office from charging the potential killers of Lindsay by the charge of MURDER ?We all need to find the reason for AG Prosecution office and Saanich police not to charge the killers of Lindsay.

  33. Mark says:

    I Question the Integrity from the two “Eyewitnesses.” I Question their Relationship with Joe Desousa. Investigators MUST re-interview the so-called “Eyewitnesses.”

    • Wyatt says:

      Hopefully ONE DAY this execution file will be removed from the SPD because anything coming out of that office and from the mouths of these dirty coppers holds no value at this stage. I don’t think they possess any skills to interview a stuffed rat 🐁 so I highly doubt their ability to investigate this murder is viable.🙈🙉🙊

  34. Wyatt says:

    Michael:

    I too would love to receive a copy of the documents that Capital Daily was able to acquire. However, legally, I’m not sure they are permitted to publicly share/post and furthermore perhaps they don’t want to play their cards just yet. Wish I could answer that for myself.

    I’ve had some enjoyment dissecting what was shared and taken the time to play with my theory and questions that I believe are close to the truth. If nothing else, I will stay steadfast that the Zailo’s are the evil planners at trying to get away with murder and that Horsley, Haynes, Green and many other corrupt individuals who are associated with criminals and their activities are the instigators covering up Lindsay’s murder in order to cover their own criminal conduct.

    Buziack Murder lies …..

    …… why the woman had chosen Buziak, a new real estate agent with limited experience. The woman would only say the young realtor had been “referred.” ….at minimum Buziak would need to thank the person who had allegedly recommended her. But when Buziak called around to ask her other clients, no one knew anything about it … in the documents there’s no mention of a “referral client” whom Buziak allegedly tried to contact but was away on holiday, as has been previously reported.

    * A LIE as Horsley stated Lindsay tried to contact these referrals and Horsley said they were out of town, on holidays. When in fact, according to these reports, Lindsay tried to locate these referrals via her list but came up empty, which suggests she was never provided a name of these “referrals” that’s why cell calls we’re unable to determine who these referrals were because there was none.

    Over the following days, there were 10 more calls between the Vancouver number and Buziak’s phone. If the “couple” provided a name, Buziak doesn’t seem to have told anyone or written it down. The nickname she assigned the number — “Million dollar” — offered no clues.

    * Yet another lie setup by the killer and Horsley eluding that it was fact. Lindsay NEVER previously referred to these phantom clients as “Mexicans” that came from the killer who used her BB to text Zailo.

    At some point, according to the documents, the owners of what would come to be known as the main crime phone travelled to the Island via BC Ferries. Police believe that Buziak provided the address of the now infamous, 1702 De Sousa Pl., during an approximately 10-minute call. After hanging up, according to the documents, the caller may have used MapQuest for the purpose of “familiarizing themselves with the area” and “planning escape routes.” 

    * Horsley setup this suggestion to be the killers who travelled with the cell, when in fact it could have been anybody! The owner of the crime cell is not proof of a killer.
    * What a red herring… caller used MapQuest to familiarize & plan escape route… who made that suggestion? Horsley? MapQuest is a far cry from “planning an escape route ”. Yet another red herring by Horsley.

    At 7:15pm that evening, Shirley Zailo ….showed up at the condo where her son and Buziak lived. The documents don’t say why Shirley was at the condo, but she apparently overheard a fifteen-minute conversation between Buziak and the caller. 

    * Why is this relevant if they can’t determine WHY she was at Lindsay’s? They suggest that SZ overheard a conversation but how is that relevant to Lindsay’s murder if there wasn’t some underlying connection – what’s the connection? What was the conversation? There must be remarks/statements to make it suspicious.

    According to the documents, Buziak planned to meet the caller and her husband at the home at 5:30pm. The couple would be flying in from Vancouver that afternoon. 

    * I thought Horsley stated only the man was coming? And didn’t Horsley imply that the cell travelled with the killers via ferry? Which one is it? Yet another lie. Flying? Who obtained that information? From where! Or was it made up by Horsley? And he didn’t think of a flying manifest? Oooops…. a slip up by the incompetent corrupted pig.

    Buziak appears to have felt increasingly conflicted. The commission she would get from any sale would be substantial — ….. — and according to a letter allegedly from a friend, Buziak was “stressed about money.”

    * Now that I believe. She was not necessarily ‘conflicted’ but likely extremely reserved about these alleged clients, her instincts were in overdrive and I suspect she was being pressured by SZ & JZ to show this house (as they desperately wanted her there at that time etc) the Zailo’s likely minimized or dismissed her concerns, telling her she was overly paranoid, this is when JZ offered his empty protective services to assure Lindsay nothing would happen as he would be there. And was she stressed about money? You bet. She was lining up her ducks to kick that crazy JZ to the curb and she wanted out! She needed money to do that. She was furiously independent and she wanted to get out of this awful situation on her terms, she wanted to show herself she could do it and keep her family pride. Nothing wrong with that. She just had no inkling these MF’s were going to kill her. That had never occurred to her.

    And there was an even more pressing matter: Her friend’s bachelorette party. It was in Vancouver on that Saturday night…..

    * Yeah, I don’t think that was a pressing issue in the sense she needed her bread and butter so she knew her priority was to make some sales. While she was perhaps disappointed not to make the party I’d like to know WHO concluded that it was a “pressing” issue? Horsley? Did she ever make that suggestion to anyone? She likely expressed her disappointment that she would not make the party but she was not “pressed” about that. She had her priorities figured out.

    Buziak was still awake around midnight when Zailo returned home from playing hockey. In another previously unreported detail, Zailo offered — as apparently he had done before — to do the showing for Buziak (…..). As well, Zailo reminded Buziak that she had received a similar call from a woman about a month earlier, and that the client’s $900,000 budget had been almost identical. But in that case, the mysterious call had ultimately yielded a sale. There’s no indication the two calls are connected, and Zailo appears to have brought it up only to reassure Buziak.

    * Who believes any of this? Zailo just made this up to give the appearance that he was a loving, caring BF. Not! There’s no collaborative evidence to support this and it’s extremely self serving for Zailo. I don’t believe any of this conversation happen. Especially at this time we are fully aware that it was no secret that Lindsay was dumping this butthead and getting out of dodge. Just another red herring set up by Zailo and concluded by the incompetent Horsley.

    The days leading up to the showing would also reveal an odd pattern in Buziak’s online activity…. Saanich Police would closely examine Buziak’s laptop, which Zailo voluntarily provided….. the police noted that there were missing chat messages, though they were unable to determine when those files had been deleted. Facebook —was another source of inquiry the Saanich Police noticed — a span ranging from two weeks before Buziak’s death until one day after — “there were no messages from any of Buziak’s 700 friends …” (The messages being discussed appear to have been from Buziak’s “wall,” where friends could post messages seen by other friends). Given Buziak’s usual pattern of daily Facebook activity, investigators found this “very odd,” but it’s unclear what, if anything, they believe is responsible for the change. 
    On Buziak’s list of Facebook friends, they quickly saw people who were “violent criminals and involved in the illegal distribution of drugs.” The names of those people are still heavily redacted, but the Saanich Police initially believed that Buziak’s association to them “may have played a role” in her death. The documents also mention Buziak’s four-day trip to Calgary in December, 2007. Buziak was visiting her father, but also went out with friends. As has been previously reported, at least one of those friends was involved in a major drug bust after Buziak’s death. If those details are in the documents, they are still redacted.

    * Zailo provided the laptop, at what timeframe? AFTER Lindsay’s murder? Why was this laptop not with Lindsay? In her vehicle? If not on her person? I’ve never been with a real estate agent who didn’t have their laptop attached to their hip. It’s pretty obvious Zailo (or someone he knew) deleted the damaging messages. He would have something to gain whereas Lindsay had nothing to hide.
    * While Horsley was attempting to setup a drug related connection to Lindsay’s murder the information he tried to suggest (guilt by association) backfired when they could not extract any form of drug activity with Lindsay. None. Zero. Zilch. Horsley was cornered and he had to walk on eggshells because he IS THE ONE who is connected to the drug/money laundering/real estate scandals so he didn’t want to draw attention to these criminals because ultimately he would probably piss them off by pointing Lindsay’s murder in their direction, thereby drawing ‘heat’ to them. So Horsley had to leave the ball in the air by stating they could find no drug connection but that’s because he had no evidence…. says he.

    On February 2, the day of the showing, Buziak stopped by Remax’s office, where she worked. According to a receptionist whose identity is still redacted…. the receptionist said Buziak was feeling “really weird” and “freaked out” about the showing. Buziak appears to have provided the receptionist and another coworker with the phone number for “Million dollar” to see if they could find a record with other agents in Victoria. Nothing came back. 

    * Even on this day, her instincts were accurate, she desperately tried to explain her reservations to herself, looking for an odd connection that would give her cause to halt the entire thing. But nothing of significant backed up her instincts, it must have been extremely frustrating cause ya can’t explain instincts, you just feel it. Haven’t we all been there?

    Buziak is said to have eaten quickly, wanting to change before the showing. The documents say Zailo once again offered to show the house on Buziak’s behalf, but Buziak apparently declined. In typical fashion for the busy, sociable realtor, she apparently planned on attending both the showing and the Vancouver bachelorette party. 

    * This information is bogus and self serving for Zailo. There’s absolutely nothing to collaborate this statement and it’s solely from the assisted killer himself.

    Around 4:30pm, Buziak likely returned to her and Zailo’s condo. While she was getting ready for the showing, Zailo went to SHC Autographx, an autoshop five minutes from Sauce. The owners had apparently hired Buziak to help sell a property, and Zailo seems to have gone there to present an offer. 

    * Here’s where things go terribly askew. Lindsay never returned to her condo to ‘change’…. that’s another self serving statement from Zailo to coordinate the timeline the killers have arranged. It’s quite easy to verify if Lindsay did in fact change her clothes, I’m sure the waitress or cams could depict whether she was killed in the same attire that she had lunch. But no where does anyone claim to verify that evidence. Lindsay had never been in this house, she wanted a heads up for herself to know what the layout was etc. She went directly to the house to be the professional she was and sought knowledge of its existence. Any good realtor does that and she was good. She was at the house cia. 5pm
    * I don’t believe ANY of Zailo’s rationale to be truthful and be where he was, when he was. This is all an alibi setup. If he promised Lindsay that he would accompany her at the house, than why was he not with her? Why did it take him over an hour to depart from this SHC location when he was to be with Lindsay? And wasn’t this place closed on this Saturday, at 2pm? No one explained that discrepancy. Zailo didn’t want to be anywhere near the crime scene or be a part of it.

    While at SHC, Buziak called Zailo to tell him she was on her way to Gordon Head. The documents say Zailo then offered to meet her there, ostensibly to deliver the paperwork from the SHC couple — which may have required Buziak’s signature — but also to make sure she was okay. The documents say that Buziak agreed to let Zailo follow her, but still wanted to do the showing herself. As Zailo later told police, Buziak had a “very strong personality and liked to do things herself.” 
    * I suppose cell records would have verified this call but the content and intent is solely from Zailo. I would suggest Zailo asked Lindsay to call him once she arrived at the house and the intent was so Zailo had knowledge that she was indeed there and the killing would follow shortly from this call, giving him a timeline to arrive. As for Zailo stating he offered his BF services yet again is suspect as its only self serving and the other party who is privileged to this conversation is deceased so it’s only Zailo who makes it up to suit his alibi. As for Lindsay signing documents, there’s no mention from Zailo at previous points that they discussed any such paperwork. Lindsay is an independent person, not stubborn or strong willed as Zailo implies, she probably agreed to his suggestion to drive over to the house to do whatever it was he was telling her he needed to do but looking after her welfare was not one of them. Let us not loose the intent of Lindsay to split from this fool at a time that would be financially viable so I’m sure she didn’t express any affection for his presence at this time. And all this time, Zailo is very aware that she intends to kick him to the curb very soon. He can deny this fact but too many other very credible witnesses knew this was her intent.

    Right around the same time, the documents say Zailo got another call, which was from his friend Cohen Oatman. According to Oatman’s redacted statement to police, he and Zailo had plans to meet for dinner, but his cell phone battery had died and he called Zailo from a payphone in town. The two decided to go to the Gordon Head house together to wait for Buziak before presumably continuing on with their plans. Oatman drove to the SHC parking lot, left his vehicle, and got into Zailo’s 2005 Range Rover. Security footage shows them leaving SHC at 5:30pm.

    * This is apparently a complete lie! Pay phones are very traceable & If Oatman used one he would have been able to identify its location and time it was used but apparently there were no pay phones! And he supposedly used his cell to call 911…. interesting. And none of us can understand how Zailo just ate at 16:30 and was planning dinner an hour later, how hungry is this guy? This is where the picture doesn’t fit the story in a very obvious way.

    According to the documents, Zailo tried to find the address using his vehicle’s navigation system, but it didn’t work, so he called Buziak to ask for directions. The visiting couple had apparently just arrived at the house and Buziak had to cut the conversation short: “Oh, I’ve got to go. They’re here.” Zailo then told her to text him the address. The text came soon after, and Zailo responded by letting Buziak know he was on his way. As has been previously reported, that last text was never opened. 

    * This is the timeframe that Lindsay was murdered.
    * There is no time stamp for this call. A very crucial time because according to Zailo he talked to Lindsay (although we think it was one of the killers) and while he called on the pretence for directions, he was attempting to find out where he was in terms of arriving and if the killing was complete. We were given two versions of the response, supposedly from Lindsay, one being “they are here” and the other “the Mexicans are here”….. which one is it? Although we think it’s irrelevant other than Lindsay NEVER called these phantom clients “Mexicans” and we believe it was SZ using Lindsay BB at this time to give the appearance that Lindsay was still alive, when in fact she was not. And Zailo’s version of events do not fit the picture, again! Why would he need directions or an address? If he states he is this wonderful, loving, caring BF who only wished to attend for Lindsay’s welfare would he not have known before…. way before…. where this house was located? Not to mention the builder, Desousa, is extensibly connected to the Zailo’s via personal and business dealing so Zailo knew where the house was. This call was a ruse call to understand where he was in terms of arrival time and alibi.
    * The last text from Zailo stating he was on his way – that was intended for the killer to know where he was in relation to arrival time. It was not opened because the killer(s) were busy cleaning up and setting up there crime scene, there was much work to do in a very short period of time. Besides the recipient of a text does not have to “open” it to read the beginning of a text again another inconsistent statement by Horsley.

    Zailo and Oatman arrived at the house about 5:45pm. As they were turning onto the street, Zailo is said to have glimpsed a male figure through one of the house’s front door windows. Reading the documents gives the impression that the sound of Zailo’s vehicle prompted the couple to abandon their plan of leaving out the front door and instead flee out the back, as police have said they did. 

    * Zailo stalled his arrival time as much as he could stretch but he was still too early! The killers had completed their killing but not the crime scene setup. Zailo arrived just after the killers had activated the lockbox to appear that Lindsay had done it and they rushed back into the house, locked the door, RZ made a dash for the rear fence while SZ needed to return Lindsay cell back on her person, she ran upstairs, jammed it into Lindsay jacket pocket and “pocket dialed” without realizing she’d done that in her rush to return it. She also stopped to grab Lindsay shoes to throw downstairs at the entrance because she wanted it to appear that Lindsay had taken off her shoes when in fact, she did not. While doing this rushed organized crime scene, SZ was in stocking feet, up/down the stairs, hence that would explain the bloody footprints in stockings, if that is indeed evidence.

    * The description of the alleged clients is unconvincing. I don’t believe they existed, nor do I believe they were witnessed. None of these “witnesses” have ever shown themselves or made claim to their statements. Perhaps they did witness people, but it was not on this day, at this time or conducive to this killing.

    Previous reporting has been vague about what happened next, saying Zailo “and a friend” found Buziak’s body, and that the two subsequent 911 calls were made by the same person. But the documents shed significant light on this critical time and contradict previous accounts. 
    After pulling onto the street — a tiny cul-de-sac with only one finished house at the time — Zailo texted and called Buziak’s cell. Her black BMW was in the driveway, he noticed, but there were no other cars on the road (and police say the suspect couple left on foot). For ten minutes, Zailo and Oatman waited and watched. Again, by my team’s calculations, they got out at about 6:00pm and walked up to the house. The front door was closed and locked, which Zailo found odd (during real estate showings, the front door is customarily left open). He rang the doorbell “about ten times” with no answer.

    * Contradiction. Zailo sat around, pointed his vehicle in the wrong direction, moved it to another location to obscure line of sight to the home and texted more unanswered texts to ensure it was clear for him to enter the home, clearing his alibi time for arrival at the crime scene.

    Zailo and Oatman then walked to the back of the house. They looked for a basement entrance “but found it in darkness,” according to the documents. They returned to the front yard and peered in the windows. Buziak had unlocked the house with a lockbox — a lockable container used by realtors to store house keys — and Zailo theorized Buziak must have taken it inside the house with her, preventing anyone else from entering. Zailo noticed the “for sale” sign on the lawn, which — in the still relatively early days of cell phones — had the office number of the listing agent and not their personal cell number. It was after-hours, and Zailo called his mother to get a direct line for the house’s listing agent, who was one of Buziak’s colleagues. He then paged the agent asking for the passcode for the garage, but the documents don’t say if any response was received. 

    * Basement entrance? This has never been identified as an avenue to enter and found in darkness. What does that mean? There is a basement entrance and Oatman & Zailo found it in the dark? Bizarre and inconsistent with the sliding door entrance. Who makes the statement that Lindsay accessed the lockbox? Zailo? Or Horsley? While it may be evident that the box was indeed accessed at the time stated (17:29) it DOES NOT depict WHO that person was. We are fairly certain it wasn’t Lindsay as she was long deceased at 17:29. And where is that key? On Lindsay? Did SZ put it there when she returned Lindsay’s BB?
    * The conversation between Zailo and SZ is highly unlikely to have been as stated, which is given by Zailo, by the way. It was likely a tip to SZ of Zailo’s position at the house and getting some kind of “ok” for him to enter as they had cleared the killing scene. Another failed follow up with the listing agent (cell records) to validate that Zailo made an effort to contact the listing agent. And while we’re on the subject of listing agents, isn’t it customary and work ethic to advise the listing agent of a showing? No mention of that information ever having been acquired.

    At 6:05pm, Zailo called 911. According to a transcripted summary of the call, he explained that he and his girlfriend were both realtors, and that she was meeting a female client from out of town. He then said Buziak had asked him to “kind of follow her” because she was “kind of scared.” He had arrived at the house after Buziak, he said, and seen a man “in the door” (it had glass panels). He and his friend had tried the door but it was locked. Buziak’s car was there, and through the front door window he could see the heels she had kicked off prior to walking through the house.

    * A full 25 mins (or longer) he waited and stalled for time before making a serious effort to ensure Lindsay’s welfare. If the bells rang any louder here, we’d all be deaf!
    * Where did he get female from? I thought everyone believed it was a lone male she was to meet.
    * All of Zailo’s statements from this point on are weak and unbelievable. He interjects his assessment of events to suit his alibi and deflect any suspicion. He thinks we’re all as stupid and sacked-out on steroids as he is. Poor fella. He has no clue how obvious his involvement is.

    After hanging up, (from 911) Zailo and Oatman walked to the side of the house, and for the first time noticed a large, almost completely enclosed patio. They peered over the fence and saw the open back door, at which point they began to panic. Zailo boosted his friend over the fence before running back around to the front door. Oatman went through the inside of the house and unlocked the front door. Zailo and Oatman then began doing a sweep of the house, Oatman covering the first floor while Zailo ran at what he has described as full speed upstairs. 

    * Now they panic! Really! And again the story doesn’t fit the picture. Ask any loving, caring BF who would find themselves in this position, they would either have kicked in the front door OR they themselves would have leaped the fence. We all know how powerful and strong we are in the panic moment with adrenaline and there’s no way a real BF would have behaved the way Zailo did. He was simply staying to his script to solidify an alibi, it was not he who made entrance to the house, but someone else so he could not be accused of being “alone” in the home for even a short period of time, that would draw suspicion that he may have compromised evidence. It’s all so orchestrated and planned, however weak, but planned nonetheless.
    * Going directly upstairs is so obviously staged in the sense he forgot his rehearsed choreograph and in his “panic” he was to sweep the downstairs first, with Oatman, then upstairs, probably with the intent of Oatman finding Lindsay rather than Zalio but that plan didn’t execute as expected so he improvised and later couldn’t rationalize his movements so he made up the scenario of Oatman was to sweep downstairs.

    Buziak was in the master bedroom at the top of the stairs. As soon as Zailo found her, he appears to have summoned Oatman, who made a second call to 911 at 6:11pm. According to Oatman’s summary of the call, he said that he and Zailo had just entered the house, seen “bloody footprints” and found Buziak lying in a “pool of blood.” The documents say Zailo checked Buziak’s arm for a pulse and tried to perform CPR. Police would later say she had been attacked between 5:38 and 5:41pm, when her Blackberry made an accidental call. This is corroborated by the coroner’s report — a previously undisclosed document — that puts her time of death at approximately 5:40pm, five minutes before Zailo and Oatman showed up. The official cause of death was determined to be blood loss due to “multiple” stab wounds.

    * Oatman made the 2nd 911 call. I thought his cell was dead? Or did he use Zailo’s? No evidence presented on this issue. At 18:11 Lindsay has been long deceased, likely shortly after her arrival time (cia 5pm) up to approximately 17:20 no where near the pocket dial time. The killers had a ton of work to do before they could exit the scene and killing Lindsay at 17:40 would just not fit the picture and provides the killers very little time to cleanup, setup and clear out.
    * it’s not rocket science that coroner’s do not give specific time of deaths. It would be suspect how this coroner could make such an accurate ruling or is this remark concluded by Horsley to fit the pocket dial? Coroner’s will present a time frame of death, never by specific minutes. In this case, Lindsay’s time of death should have been from her soonest arrival at the house and the actual discovery of her body, in other words, between 16:45 – 18:11
    * CPR on a body with 40+ holes! She would have been in a very large pool of her blood, in fact she was likely all bled out at this stage. This was simply a “show” for Zailo to give the appearance he made an effort….. yeah right. An effort to ensure she was dead. Dead people don’t talk.

    When the Saanich Police arrived, the documents show they took Zailo to the police station for an interview, checked the house to see if anyone was still inside, and began searching the area with a canine unit. The police dog deployed apparently searched along the property’s eastern and western perimeter, but not along the south, which was considered “contaminated” by the movements of police officers and first-responders (who presumably threw the dog off the scent). Inside the house, police searched for a “knife or other sharp object,” hair and fibre evidence, DNA, and “blood splatter” evidence. They don’t appear to have found a weapon, but what they were able to determine from the other evidence — including the bloody footprints — is not apparent. The property owner, who had been in the home just prior to the showing, appears to have provided fingerprint and footprint samples so they could be eliminated from suspicion

    * At this stage we will never know what the SPD did/didn’t do. How proficient and efficient they really were. With Horsley at the helm and his merry minions and the allegations of SPD corruption and cover up, we will probably never know the extent of this botched and inept police force. There would appear to be a very extensive scandal in the midst of the SPD and Lindsay’s execution is collateral damage for a very personal hatred and violent rage. Steroids and drugs will do that along with a skitzo mommy that has your umbilical cord still attached makes for a volatile recipe.

    According to the documents, the Saanich Police then immediately looked into the phone used to contact Buziak. It was pre-paid and had not been used to contact anyone but Buziak. The name used to register the phone was “Paulo Rodriquez,” which the Saanich Police determined to be a fake name. 
    Based on cell tower information, police appear to know the area where the phone was purchased, and where the person or people who used the phone are “mostly likely from.” They also determined there was a second phone that had been used to check the voicemail of the first, and therefore suspected that two “crime phones” and various “conspirators” had planned and facilitated Buziak’s death. Eventually, the Saanich Police found the real identity of the owner of both phones, though that name — for now — remains blacked out.

    * And why can these incompetent, dirty cops not make a charge? It’s almost 13 years for Lindsay how much longer?

    RIP LINDSAY BUZIAK, WE WILL ALWAYS KEEP TRYING!

    • Robin says:

      Well done

    • Robin says:

      Well done Wyatt.
      Another thing that sticks out to me is this….

      At 7:15pm that evening, Shirley Zailo ….showed up at the condo where her son and Buziak lived. The documents don’t say why Shirley was at the condo, but she apparently overheard a fifteen-minute conversation between Buziak and the caller.

      SZ showed up because she knew there would be a conversation happening at that exact time. She was there to gauge Lindsay’s reaction and any comments she made to Jason after. They needed to see if Lindsay was questioning or suspicious of anything at that point. SZ and JaSIN discussed her coming over prior without a doubt. They are the worst kind of people on earth. Unmistakable psychopaths. Real fks ups.
      B.C. 🐝 careful….of wolves in cheap clothing

      • Wyatt says:

        Ahhh… I would agree with you. Make sense now. Thanks for filling that gap.

      • Svetlana says:

        Definitely suspicious and she said in Dateline she took a walk with Lindsay the night before. For what? To give her pointers on how to sell the house? Because as I have said they wanted control over her every move and watch her. Like cats watch and play with their meal before they pounce on it. I wish another legal jurisdiction will take over this investigation for once and for all.

        • Wyatt says:

          I believe there was “no walk” – that is simply a lie. There’s no way Lindsay had any connection with this nut-bar so this statement Is not collaborative by the other person who apparently was part of it! Just another mommy dearest lie! Thinking she’s smarter than the cops. Well, in this case, we’re all smarter than these dirty pigs.

    • ConnectTheDots says:

      Good job Wyatt! So what do the police do with all of these glaring inconsistencies? They clear the most obvious suspects almost from the get go. Outrageous and makes them look guilty alongside the Zailos. Not what the tax payers are paying them for. We need someone else to solve this very solvable case and launch an investigation into the SPD.

      • Just a Canadian Citizen says:

        Wow great job. When you look at every situation as you have it becomes even more clear. My heart hurts for Lindsay, just a young woman trying to get a successful career on her own to be brutally murdered. Someone must have the morales to get this case solved.

        • Just a Canadian Citizen says:

          I will never understand why there is no one in CANADA that can take over this case and solve it?????????????????????????

          • ConnectTheDots says:

            I suspect that there is money laundering involved on some level. Money laundering is a huge problem in B.C. Even with the long overdue current investigation going on I’ll bet we only get scraps of insight into the real scope of the situation.

            • Robin says:

              Agree, I am expecting to be told more BS when Austin Cullen finishes his inquiry. I hope not but I too had the same thought. B.C. is very corrupt, Vancouver and Vancouver Island are out of control and have been for possibly 20 years. B.C. Be careful…Brutally Corrupt…Broke Citizens….not so Beautiful B.C.

              • Wyatt says:

                Yup at least 20 years! We are going back to the Gordon Campbell (Mr. Drunk himself) and the Christy (crusty) Clark era’s. That’s 20 years of liberal scandals. Remember the BC rail? Same 💩 just a different subject and this one includes coverup and corruption of a murder that had absolutely no connection to this money laundering/drug money. Politicians protecting their financial resource of “donations” to the Liberal party. It’s all so disgraceful and shameful. It all disgusts me to no end.

    • micheal says:

      wait just so I’m clear , you no longer think SZ did the killing then came back to stage the the show of lindsay meeting a couple? Now your saying the couple never existed.
      Im just making sure I understand you properly because not to long ago at all, maybe just a few weeks ago, I beileve you were pretty admant and telling me and Roseanne I beileve her name was that we had no clue, didn’t know what they were talking when we said we don’t think SZ did the killing and then came back to stage the meeting.
      I must be misunderstanding something cause I thought you made it pretty clear that anyone who doesnt think that SZ killed her AND then came back after to stage the meeting killing lindsay is clueless. now not only are they not clueless you dont even think thats what happend anymore yourself?
      maybe I’m confusing you with someone else, ill have to scroll back in the comments to look. because I’m kinda stunned right now, on this 180 flip.

      • Wyatt says:

        Who exactly is your inquiry addressed to? It is very difficult to decipher what you’ve written. If it is me, Wyatt, and if I read your post correctly, there’s no 180 to my original post. I NEVER believed SZ was part of the greeting committee, in fact, I don’t believe that trio ever existed. My position has always been that these “witnesses” to the trio were fictitious or sadly mistaken. I will never be convinced that a “wig” can be identified as a “wig” and the detail of description just does not correspond with the hour of late dusk… I don’t believe anyone can see anything that specifically at that distance or time. I will ALWAYS be of the position that SZ & RZ were in stealth mode in the master closet, Desousa led Ms. Lindsay to the killing field while she crossed the room to the master ensuite, out sprang the killer family in hazmat suits and ambushed her from behind… hence no defensive wounds, she did not see them coming and succumbed to her violent killing almost instantly. The rest is explained, I think rather articulately on my lengthy dissection of the documents. Trust this will clarify MY position.

        • ConnectTheDots says:

          That does sound possible. That would mean that either one or two people posed as witnesses and told a complete lie to the police or the lie came from the police themselves. The witness description of what happened is too on spot to the situation to have been anything else, imo.

          • Wyatt says:

            I agree with you CTD. Either a lie by either parties (witnesses or police) OR if there is an ounce of truth than they are sadly mistaken on the date/time of this alleged sighting. I will NEVER be convinced that one can identify a wig as a wig at any distance or this time of day.

            • ConnectTheDots says:

              I think that the whole idea of a blonde wig comes from the witness description of the woman buyer looking so much like SZ, complete with her distinct style of dress, only with blonde hair. Also, close associates of theirs who just happen to live close to that house have been known to own such a wig.

              • Svetlana says:

                The police could’ve easily checked all stores in BC for wig purchases by Zailo.

                • ConnectTheDots says:

                  No need for the Zailos to buy one. They had a close associate that lived near the murder house that was known to already have one. Just like the hair of the witness account of the female buyer.

        • OceanWaves says:

          The woman’s hair often looks like she is wearing a wig likely because she has a bad hair cut / not a good stylist. It’s like a perpetual bad hair day. From King James Bible: Luke:8:16 No man, when he hath lighted a candle, covereth it with a vessel, or putteth it under a bed; but setteth it on a candlestick, that they which enter in may see the light. and 17 For nothing is a secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.
          Look out wig / not wig lady and accomplice. You’ve had 13 years to do the right thing, turn yourselves in. You will not get away with murder. Not under the scrutiny of this parent and others that support Lindsay and her family.

      • Rosanne says:

        I agree with you Michael.

    • Michael says:

      if rz made a run out the back and sz accessed lockbox at 530 i assume she would be in a hurry as well, after all rz has already ran out under this theory.
      but you have sz settings the lockbox at 530 and in no rush at all even though rz has made a run for it, you actually have sz taking 11 mins from accessing lockbox to go back upstairs to put black berry back in pocket? doesn’t add up.
      as as far as ” setting up crime scene ” what does that mean? what did they set up ?
      also under your theory way is it lindsay is showing up 40 mins ahead of the time the showing is supposed to start?

      • ConnectTheDots says:

        Showing up early to a showing 40 minutes early is no big deal at all. It gives you time to familiarize yourself with the house and this being a very big sale would make total sense. Ryan would not have been making a mad dash to safety. I think he just calmly walked out back through the fence and bushes and into a waiting van. Shirley could have also done the same after she accessed the lockbox and put Lindsay’s phone back into her pocket ( pocket dial occurs ). Neighbor then drives Ryan to the house he was supposed to be at and Shirley to a near by location to walk up to the murder scene from. There had not been any attention brought to this murder and no one was paying any attention to what was unfolding. They must have thought that it went off without a hitch. They did not count on Jeff and the scrutiny that this case would have. Under scrutiny you can see all of the slip ups and things they didn’t consider like, when you are using a security camera to serve as your alibi, don’t stare up into it to make sure it recognizes who you are. Don’t say that you do not know people if there is a clear record of you knowing them well. I could go on and on.

        • following says:

          There is no way that the murderer accessed the lockbox at the time of murder. That clearly would have been the smoking gun. The key was accessed well before and most likely a copy made. The clearest motive comes from Lindsay’s remarks to her dad about seeing something she shouldn’t. Stranger random kill is not likely. Too elaborate of a plan. Random would have been done with minimum contact. Phone, make appointment, show up, close door, attack. If it was perceived she was wealthy it would have been ransom situation. Sex assault would have been 1 person or 2 men. Straight random murder would have not been so planned. Too much contact increases risk of being caught. Random murder of realtor at residence is typically one perpetrator. Clearly, Lindsay was intended target. You have to ask why?

  35. come on man says:

    Disclosure in respect of informant handler notes — Officers that have “handled” informants understand the delicate balance between handler notes, intelligence (information), and protection of the informant’s identity. Although practices vary slightly amongst police agencies, most dictate that all intelligence derived from a confidential informant be reproduced in the handler notes, and those notes are then carefully guarded and disclosure, even to other members of the police force, is severely restricted. Under that protocol, only non-identifying information from the handler notes will be downloaded into source debriefing reports.

    Are we supposed to entertain the notion that an officer of the court would disclose the name of an informant or other minute details with some anyone?

    • Wyatt says:

      So what are you telling us? That informants are free to commit murder because their “handler” willfully looks the other way? Are you saying informants are above the law and operate without impunity?

      • Robin says:

        This is Beautuful B.C. don’t forget. Where
        Being Corrupt pays, you will only thrive in B.C. if you leave your morals at home. Never attempt to leave home with morals and do not dare get on a B.C. Ferry heading to Vancouver Island!!! You will not thrive and may not even survive. B.C.
        Be Careful. Victoria, B.C. ( 🐝 careful)

  36. Elaine says:

    Can you please let me know the reasons why it’s so obvious Jason was involved ? If liars change their story why did Jason AND Cohen BOTH tell the same story at first and then changed the story after police clarified what happened ?? Do you believe Cohen was involved as well ? Even though apparently Cohen was not close with Jason and didn’t even want to go out with him ? Does anyone have a link for the dateline episode that works ?- the one linked on this website doesn’t work anymore. I heard it has an interview with Jason maybe then it will be more obvious to me that he was involved if I can see his demeanour.

    • Svetlana says:

      I am not sure why their video on Dateline is not working, nor why copies of it were taken down from youtube. Maybe someone can contact them and see what is happening.

      I can say from what I remember of that video, Jason’s demeanor screams GUILTY. You can see him being interviewed in some youtube videos from the justice for Lindsay walk. Again, very shifty and hiding something behind those guilty eyes and almost looking satisfied.

      • Robin says:

        To me on Dateline and on news show at walk he looks scared shitless!!!!! And why did Mommy have to take her baby there? Jeff and Matt didn’t have Mommies with them!!! He was so uncomfortable because he knew it was all lies and he knew people could see through it.
        As far as the show not being available on YouTube I think it is making money on other networks in Ireland plus I’m pretty sure it has been on Oprah’s channel. It’s out there but they are making $$ elsewhere.

        • Wyatt says:

          I know – right? How does one remove the umbilical cord from mommy dearest when your that age? Wonder if he still wets the bed?

        • Michael says:

          well to be fair Shirley is relevant to the case , so she has a reason to be there herself. I imagine dateline spefically invited her unlike Jeff and Matt’s mom. it not like she was merely there for motherly support.
          And had Jeff or Matt brought someone say even there Mother for emtional or some sort of support I dont think I would mock that and say they needed their mommies.

          • Wyatt says:

            FAIR to mommy dearest! 🤮
            What an awful post. Who gives a rats behind about the NUT BAR from hell.
            And I’ll make bets that steroid/drug user JaSIN still wets the bed! 😀

            • Michael says:

              oo yeah, if you had comprehension skills there is no way you could even interpret the goal of what I said as fair to ” mommy dearest” if anything it could be interpreted as asking to be fair to Jason as the insult of needing his mommy was directed at him. But again you let you emtions override your brains ability to think straight.
              but again im always fair to the truth, the truth is the only thing that matters , if a particular truth happens to reflect good on a bad person or bad on a good its still is truth., im sorry I have the emtional maturity to understand that .
              I’m also wise enough to understand it actually hurts the case against SZ and JZ if people realize things are being made up just to bash them. Why not just stick to bashing them based on truthful things? it gives the bashing more credibility.
              But no sorry a fact is a fact SZ was not simply at the dateline as emtional support for Jason, she was there because dateline specifically requested her there, and did not apparently request and interview of Jeff mom or Matt’s mom.
              To say otherwise is to spread lies and false information, and the truth to me is more important than Zailo bashing.

          • Robin says:

            To be fair, nothing doing! SZ was not relevant to Dateline, JaSIN needed Mommy, Dateline did not need Mommy Dearest. What did she add to it, absolutely NOTHING!! “We loved Lindsay for that” oh please Michael, she was there to keep him on script. They both look like deer in headlights anyway and the big bus was going to nail them, that was enlightening for viewers IMO. The Zailo’s were never prepared for television shows, media, blogs or for so many people to recognize guilt when they see it. They expected Lindsay’s unsolved murder to be forgotten long ago. This is what has surprised them and in the end will bring them down. Justice for Murder is the only answer here. People UNITE, I’m with Jeff. Murder is not something we will accept. Don’t put lipstick on pigs 🐽 Michael.

            • micheal says:

              you need to work on your comprehension skills and re read the original comment i replied to and what I oringally wrote.
              its has nothing to do with putting lipstick on a pig.
              I simply stated the reality, SZ was involved she was lindsays boss at the time, she was there because dateline invited her there to be interviewed. she was not there simply because Jason needed her for support.
              some of you people let your emtions block out your common sense and reason. relax.
              I’m very against murder and with Jeff as well. And being the level headed guy Jeff seems to be, I im sure he would want a real justice true and fair trial for SZ and or who ever else may have done this and not a lynch mob.
              So excuse me for being able to simply point out a small fact. I just didn’t want people who had not seen the dateline to be mislead, and think she was just there cause Jason wanted her rather, rather than the truth which was dateline wanted her there to be interviewed.

  37. micheal says:

    along with my other comment from today’s date about Jason possibly having lindsay phone the entire time from the moment they leave lunch, he could have not only hurried up the stairs to get his last task done of putting phone on her,,, he probably would have wanted to rush up there too cause he didn’t want CO to see him take the phone and slide it in lindsay pocket.

    • Louise says:

      Pinging would have validated this scenario. Course we’ll never know the truthful investigation skills that were applied (or not) because Horsley can’t keep his lying in order. I believe mommy-dearest was lingering around at this time but she wasn’t “lingering” as she was in panic mode trying to hustle her and boy-goofy out of the crime scene because her other goon-boy had arrived too early.

      • micheal says:

        thanks , I wasnt sure how close everything was , ( from house, where they had lunch etc and just how many sqaure miles a ping can narrow something down.
        So i guess im still not sold on the theory SZ did the killing than came back after to put on a staged meeting. Not saying she didnt do it, simply saying i dont think that that is the order of events. I still beileve lindsay was alive did meet out front with a couple and was killed after.
        On another matter i just out of curiosity Googled SZ and saw her real estate business webpage, and sure it just a personal feeling but that zebra print dress she has on, on that webpage just gave me a bad feeling. Someone clearly likes black dresses with a very unique and bold pattern on the front. I mean to me personally the tone of that dress is so similar to the murder dress i cant beileve she would even wear it let alone post it for the world to see.

        • ConnectTheDots says:

          One of the many little incriminating details they didn’t think of. A blonde wig should do it without any thought about the very distinctive style of dress typically worn by her and the many pictures that exist with her wearing them.

        • ConnectTheDots says:

          Nor did they think about the fact that the blonde wig is exactly the same style and length as her own hair. Hmmm.

          • Louise says:

            Q? Where did this “blonde wig” identity come from? Who made that conclusion? How could anyone identify a wig, especially at dusk and at a distance (I assume – according to witness claim)? Is this a truthful, accurate piece of evidence?

            • Robin says:

              Or is this part of JaSIN’s script. He really had lots of lines to remember. Too bad the bozo SPD can’t get the job done, it would be so easy to trip him up. This only adds to the fact the SPD are helping to keep Lindsay’s murder in the UNSOLVED status it is in. Any new detective would jump at the chance to question JaSIN, a seasoned detective would wrap it all up in a couple hours. WTF 🤬 goes on at the Saanich cop shops “learning to live with lies 101”? Such a disgrace!

    • Robin says:

      Women do not hand over their cell phones to boyfriends so they can be without!!! Not a chance, no.. no.. no… never.. never.. never. Not possible. If that was even asked Lindsay would have “Shirley” said right then and there WTF is JaSIN upto and definitely called her Dad.

  38. Micheal says:

    what if JZ had lindsays phone the entire time, what if he picked it up or took it out of her purse when they were leaving lunch? him having her phone would prevent her from being able to call for help.
    what made me think of this is I was considering people theory that lindsay was killed much earlier, and SZ was the lady pretending to be the potential
    buyer that showed up around 530. but that didn’t add up. I dont see it making sense that SZ or anyone for that matter would enter house at 530 linger there for 11 minutes in a brutal crime scene for no reason than place the phone in lindays pocket at 541.
    is it possible JZ had the phone the entire time the pocket dial was done by him and part of the reason he ran up those stairs so fast knowing that looks shady is because the urge to get the phone off him and onto lindsay and complete this last task for his part in this overwhelmed the idea of playing it cool and looking a few other places first as to not look suspicious by running right to body.
    is their anything that in missing that would dismiss this as a possibility?

    • Elaine says:

      Cell tower evidence can prove whether Jason was with Lindsay or not at the time of her murder and that if her phone was in fact with her. Why don’t dummy police release this info? There also appears to be video evidence and witness testimony that confirm the timeline that police have given but they won’t share….why?

  39. Jeff Buziak, father says:

    Covid 19
    This seems to be a serious matter and a huge inconvenience for everyone. This potentially deadly virus has impacted families, individuals, businesses and the economies of every province in this country. The impact, they tell us, can be severe even though most of us don’t seem to know anyone who has died from this virus. It appears the elderly are most vulnerable as they are with all health risks from flus to pneumonia and must be protected. I suppose we all have to do our part and yes, I do wear a mask as instructed by our political leaders advised by health officials. This state of affairs makes me think and reflect as it has with most people but…..

    WHAT ABOUT MURDER? …hmmm it’s okay!

    Lindsay was murdered over twelve years ago now and not by virus but by the deliberate act of individuals who are actually the most deadly disease of mankind and society. How many murders since Lindsay’s in B.C.? Why no public warnings? Why no action by politicians? Why no implementation of existing laws by the justice system? Why no containment/arrests by police? Why are we not wearing guns to protect ourselves? A virus that could potentially cause death sees an enormous effort by political leaders to stop but the murder of a woman in Saanich, B.C. and the murder and missing of hundreds of women unsolved is OKAY IN BRITISH COLUMBIA.

    A virus is maybe; Murder is definite! The media and politicians are all over a virus but murder our women and they could care less. Insanity. Doesn’t make any sense to me at all. No protection, no consequences. Stop a virus but keep murdering women. Who cares about them…..besides me and Lindsay’s supporters. Think about that. Which virus/disease is more important to you and your loved ones?

    The disease/virus that killed Lindsay and many more women in British Columbia is allowed to spread freely but a bad flu must be stopped at all costs! Insanity! Who is next? Your daughter, sister, mom, aunt, cousin……police and politicians don’t care!

    Woman in B.C. are more vulnerable to murder than they are a virus but who cares right? Put your mask on darling and you will be okay.

    • Robin says:

      Well written Jeff. I totally agree with everything you have said. We are witnessing the decline of civilization I believe. We keep up our fight for Justice for Lindsay no matter what!

  40. Micheal says:

    2 questions 1.Is there a place one can read the actual documents recently released that the news paper reported on. I have read the article and what the article says they say but would like to read the documents directly.
    2. Is it true that Phone calls from the burner phone were made to Lindsay to begin setting up this showing PRIOR to the drug bust in Calgary even taking place?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: